Direct Auto Insurance v. Carter et al

3:25-cv-00206Tnmd14 de nov. de 2025

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
DIRECT AUTO INSURANCE,
Plaintiff,
v.
MARIO CARTER, ET AL.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:25-cv-206
Judge Aleta A. Trauger
ORDER
On October 27, 2025, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No.
25), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore
ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. 	For the reasons
expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion for Default Judgment as to Ashton Franks
(Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED, and the court hereby declares that the plaintiff will not be liable for
coverage, indemnity, or a defense with regard to any claims made against Ashton Franks in
connection with a car accident that occurred on July 3, 2024, as Franks was an excluded driver
under the relevant policy.
The Clerk shall enter judgment as to defendant Ashton Franks only in accordance with Rule 58,
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
______________________________
ALETA A. TRAUGER
United States District Judge
Case 3:25-cv-00206 Document 27 Filed 11/14/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.