Hollis v. Holloway et al

3:24-cv-00178Tnmd9 de mar. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
HORACE HOLLIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES M. HOLLOWAY, et al.,
Defendant.
Case No. 3:24-cv-00178
Judge Eli J. Richardson
Magistrate Judge Luke A. Evans
ORDER
Defendant Cpl. f/n/u White filed a motion for leave to late file answer to Plaintiff’s
complaint. (Doc. No. 39.) The time to respond in opposition to the motion has passed and no
response has been filed by Plaintiff Horace Hollis. The motion is therefore GRANTED. The
Clerk’s Office is DIRECTED to file the answer as a separate docket entry.
Plaintiff’s motion for entry of default (Doc. No. 36) and motion for a decision on the motion
for entry of default (42) are DENIED AS MOOT.
It is so ORDERED.
____________________________________
LUKE A. EVANS
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 3:24-cv-00178 Document 43 Filed 03/09/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.