USA v. Rush

3:24-cr-00119Tned19 de dez. de 2025

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT KNOXVILLE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
v. 	) 	No. 3:24-CR-119-TAV-DCP
)
JOSEPH DAKOTA RUSH, 	)
)
Defendant. 	)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
All pretrial motions in this case have been referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b) for disposition or recommendation as appropriate. This case is before the Court on
Defendant Joseph Dakota Rush’s Unopposed Motion to Continue Plea Deadline and Trial Date
[Doc. 25], filed on December 12, 2025.
Defendant requests the Court to continue the plea deadline, set for December 12, 2025, and
the trial date, set for January 13, 2026, by approximately sixty days [Id. at 1]. In support of his
motion, Defendant states that his counsel and the Government are in good communication
regarding this case and are working toward a resolution in this matter, and that Defendant would
like additional time to consider his options [Id. ¶ 1]. Defendant’s motion reflects that the
Government does not oppose the continuance [Id. ¶ 4]. Defendant understands that the period of
time between the filing of this motion and a rescheduled court date will be fully excludable time
for speedy trial purposes [Id. ¶ 2].
Based on the information in Defendant’s motion and because the Government does not
oppose the continuance, the Court finds the ends of justice served by granting a continuance
outweigh the interests of Defendant and the public in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).
In making this determination, the Court has considered the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C.
Case 3:24-cr-00119-TAV-DCP Document 26 Filed 12/19/25 Page 1 of 3 PageID
#: <pageID>
2
§ 3161(h)(7)(B). In consideration of these factors, the Court concludes that failing to grant a
continuance would both result in a miscarriage of justice and deny counsel for Defendant the
reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due
diligence. See id. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), (iv). Defendant needs the additional time to confer with
counsel and prepare his case. The Court finds that all of this cannot occur before the January 13,
2026 trial date.
The Court therefore GRANTS Defendant Joseph Dakota Rush’s Unopposed Motion to
Continue Plea Deadline and Trial Date [Doc. 25]. The trial of this case is reset to March 31, 2026.
A new, comprehensive trial schedule is included below. Because the Court finds that the ends of
justice are served by granting a continuance outweigh the interests of Defendant and the public in
a speedy trial, all of the time between the filing of the motion on December 12, 2025, and the new
trial date is fully excludable time under the Speedy Trial Act. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(D),
(h)(7)(A)–(B).
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS as follows:
(1) 	Defendant Joseph Dakota Rush’s Unopposed Motion to Continue
Plea Deadline and Trial Date [Doc. 25] is GRANTED;
(2) 	the trial of this matter is reset to commence on March 31, 2026, at
9:00 a.m., before the Honorable Thomas A. Varlan, United States
District Judge;
(3) 	all time between the filing of the motion on December 12, 2025,
and the new trial date of March 31, 2026, is fully excludable time
under the Speedy Trial Act for the reasons set forth herein;
(4) 	the deadline for filing a plea agreement in the record and providing
reciprocal discovery is February 27, 2026;
(5) 	the deadline for filing motions in limine is March 16, 2026.
Responses to motions in limine are due on or before March 24,
2026;
Case 3:24-cr-00119-TAV-DCP Document 26 Filed 12/19/25 Page 2 of 3 PageID
#: <pageID>
3
(6) 	the parties are to appear before the undersigned for a final pretrial
conference on March 12, 2026, at 1:00 p.m.; and
(7) 	requests for special jury instructions with appropriate citations to
authority pursuant to Local Rule 7.4 shall be filed on or before
March 20, 2026.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ENTER:
_____________________________
_______________________
Debra C. Poplin
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 3:24-cr-00119-TAV-DCP Document 26 Filed 12/19/25 Page 3 of 3 PageID
#: <pageID>

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.