Ramos v. Sancity, LLC et al

4:25-cv-01203Pamd20 de fev. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LEE RAMOS,
Plaintiff,
v.
SANCITY, LLC,
MUHAMED MOHAMUD, and
AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC.,
Defendants.
No. 4:25-CV-01203
(Chief Judge Brann)
ORDER
FEBRUARY 20, 2026
In 	accordance 	with 	the 	accompanying 	Memorandum 	Opinion, 	IT 	IS
HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motions to dismiss pursuant to Rule
12(b)(6), Docs. 17 and 19, are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as
follow:
1. 	The motions to dismiss are denied as to the direct negligence claim
against Muhamed Mohamud and the vicarious liability claim against
Amazon Logistics, Inc.
2. 	The motions to dismiss are granted without prejudice as to the direct
negligence 	claims 	against 	Amazon 	Logistics 	and 	Sancity, 	LLC,
including the negligent hiring and supervision claims, and as to the
vicarious liability claim against Sancity.
Case 4:25-cv-01203-MWB Document 23 Filed 02/20/26 Page 1 of 2
2
3. 	Plaintiff may file a further amended complaint within twenty-one (21)
days of this Order.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Matthew W. Brann
Matthew W. Brann
Chief United States District Judge
Case 4:25-cv-01203-MWB Document 23 Filed 02/20/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.