Moyer v. Murray et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
GREGORY ASHLEY MOYER, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Case No. CIV-25-429-SLP
)
JAMES V. MURRAY, Attorney at Law, et al., )
)
Defendants. )
O R D E R
Upon review of the docket, certain exhibits attached to Plaintiff’s Responses to
Motions to Dismiss, [Doc. Nos. 46-5, 52-1], contain protected information to include the
names of one or more individuals that appear to be minors. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a).
Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to seal those exhibits.1
Plaintiff is reminded that the Court expects him to comply with the privacy
protection requirements of Rule 5.2(a) in all filings submitted to the Court. As explained
in the Court’s prior Order [Doc. No. 34], if a minor child’s name is referenced, Plaintiff
should redact the name and include only the child’s initials. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a)(3).
Failure to comply with the privacy protection requirements of Rule 5.2(a) in future filings
may result in those filings being summarily stricken.
1 The Court reserves the right to unseal these matters as may be warranted or to direct that redacted
versions be filed.
Case 5:25-cv-00429-SLP Document 53 Filed 07/16/25 Page 1 of 2

IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of July, 2025.
Case 5:25-cv-00429-SLP Document 53 Filed 07/16/25 Page 2 of 2