Moore v. City of Dayton Law Department et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION (DAYTON)
STEPHEN MOORE,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CITY OF DAYTON
LAW DEPARTMENT, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case No. 3:26-cv-00013
District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry
ORDER CONCERNING COMMUNICATION WITH THE COURT
Plaintiff, a pro se litigant, has called the Court to inquire about the status of his
filings. The proper way for a litigant to communicate with the Court is by written motion
filed with the Clerk of Court. To avoid any attempted ex parte communications, Plaintiff
is ORDERED to communicate with the Court solely by motion, not via telephone call or
other informal methods of communication.
Plaintiff may communicate with the Clerk of Court’s office to determine if
additional documents have been filed on the public docket for his case. He may also find
and view the public case docket online by using the PACER Case Locator tool available
at https://pcl.uscourts.gov/pcl/index.jsf.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Caroline H. Gentry
Caroline H. Gentry
United States Magistrate Judge
Case: 3:26-cv-00013-TMR-CHG Doc #: 12 Filed: 01/21/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>