Puckett v. Cross River Bank et al

3:25-cv-00382Ohsd23 de fev. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE UNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISIONAT DAYTON
REBECCA PUCKETT CASE NO. 3:25-CV-382
Plaintiff, JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
V.
CROSS RIVER BANK AND SUNLIGHT
FINANCIAL LLC d/b/a SUNLIGHT
FINANCIAL
Defendants.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL; TERMINATION ENTRY
The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has
been settled, IT IS ORDEREDthat this action is hereby DISMISSED,with prejudice as to the
parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen
the action if settlement is not consummated.
Parties intendingto preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should
be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U. S. 375 (1994), and
incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry.
The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the
parties, if necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: 23 February 2026
WALTER H. RICE, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case: 3:25-cv-00382-WHR-CHG Doc #: 19 Filed: 02/23/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.