3:24-cv-00177•Roberts v. AirStream, Inc.
Texto completo
JOSH ROBERTS, Plaintiff, V. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTMCT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OfflO WESTERNDIVISION CaseNo. :3:24-cv-177 Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr. AIRSTREAM CARAVANS, INC., et al., ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATIONENTRY Defendants. The Court having beenadvisedby counsel for the Parties that this matter hasbeen settled, and counsel for the parties having provided approval to enter a conditional dismissal, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the Parties, provided that any ofthe Parties may, upon goodcause shownwithin 60 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Prior to the end ofthe timeframe to reopen this action, the Parties may submit a substitute Judgment Entry once settlement is consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U. S. 375 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The undersigned also requires that, ifthe Parties intend to preserve this Court's jurisdiction, then they must submit to the Court a copy of the fully-executed settlement agreement (either by filing it on the docket or emailing it to his chambers). IT IS SO ORDERED. THO S M. ROSE ATES DISTRICTJUDGE Case: 3:24-cv-00177-TMR Doc #: 24 Filed: 12/03/25 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.