Hartke v. Advent SVCS, LLC

3:23-cv-00301Ohsd6 de fev. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FORTHE SOUTHERNDISTRICTOF OHIO
WESTERNDIVISIONAT DAYTON
RONALD HARTKE
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 3:23cv301
JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
vs.
ADVENTSVCS, LLC
Defendants.
ORDEROF DISMISSAL;TERMINATIONENTRY
The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has
been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the
parties, provided that anyofthe parties may, upon good cause shownwithin 120days, reopen
the action if settlement is not consummated.
Parties intendingto preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should
be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S. Ct. 1673 (1994), and
incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry.
The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the
parties, if necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
L/i^f^- t ^c<,
WALTERH. RICE,JUDGE
UNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT
Case: 3:23-cv-00301-WHR Doc #: 71 Filed: 02/06/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.