Mayhan v. Balzer et al

2:25-cv-00522Ohsd2 de fev. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
BRANDON L. MAYHAN,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY BALZER, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case No. 2:25-cv-522
District Judge Douglas R. Cole
Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr.
ORDER
This case is before the Court upon Plaintiff Brandon L. Mayhan’s Motion for Extension of
Time. (Doc. #24). Plaintiff requests a 45-day extension of time to respond to Defendants’ Motion
to Dismiss. Id.
For good cause shown, Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. #24) is hereby
GRANTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #17) is
due on or before March 12, 2026.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
February 2, 2026 	s/Peter B. Silvain, Jr.
Peter B. Silvain, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Case: 2:25-cv-00522-DRC-PBS Doc #: 25 Filed: 02/02/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.