2:24-cv-04247•Muhammad v. The Kroger Co. et al
Texto completo
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION HANEEF MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, v. THE KROGER CO., et al., Defendants. Civil Action 2:24-cv-4247 Judge Michael H. Watson Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Submit Video Evidence of Minor Child’s Statement Before City Council (ECF No. 39). Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature, because Plaintiff is not offering the video evidence in support of any identified pending motion or hearing. If Plaintiff wishes to submit the video evidence in support of a future motion or hearing, Plaintiff may renew his motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Chelsey M. Vascura CHELSEY M. VASCURA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 2:24-cv-04247-MHW-CMV Doc #: 56 Filed: 02/26/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.