2:24-cv-04191•Sivi v. Franklin County Guardianship Service Board et al
Sivi v. Franklin County Guardianship Service Board et al
2:24-cv-04191Ohsd24 de fev. de 2026
Texto completo
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Meredith Sivi, Case No. 2:24-cv-4191 Plaintiff, Judge Graham v. Magistrate Judge Jolson Franklin County Guardianship Service Board, et al., Defendants. Order Plaintiff Meredith Sivi has moved for a stay of the litigation, among other requests. The motion is based on her perception that certain individuals (who are not named defendants) are engaging in a conspiracy to conduct surveillance of her, retaliate against her, and interfere with her ability to litigate this action. Somewhat confusingly, plaintiff also asks that the pending motions for judgment on the pleadings filed by all three defendants be converted into motions for summary judgment. The Court finds that plaintiff has failed to show good cause to stay the litigation or convert the pending motions into motions for summary judgment. Two of the pending motions are fully briefed and ripe for judicial adjudication. The third was filed by defendant Upreach LLC on January 27, 2026. Plaintiff has not filed a response brief to Upreach’s motion, and the deadline has now passed for her to do so. In an abundance of caution, the Court will allow plaintiff an additional opportunity to respond to Upreach’s motion. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for a stay (Doc. 105) is DENIED. If plaintiff wishes to file a brief in response to Upreach’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, it must be received by the Court no later than March 5, 2026. In such instance, Upreach may file a reply brief no later than March 10, 2026. s/ James L. Graham JAMES L. GRAHAM United States District Judge DATE: February 24, 2026 Case: 2:24-cv-04191-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 107 Filed: 02/24/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.