Powell v. Labare et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
ZERVIER POWELL,
Plaintiff,
v.
SGT. COREY LABARE, et al.,
Defendants.
9:23-cv-848 (ECC/DJS)
Edward Sivin, Esq., for Plaintiff
Alexandra L. Galus, Asst. Attorney General, for Defendants
Hon. Elizabeth C. Coombe, United States District Judge:
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
I. 	INTRODUCTION
On July 14, 2023, Zervier Powell (Plaintiff) brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
against Corey Labare, Damian Tyler, and Jonathan Souza (Defendants), alleging excessive force
and failure to intervene in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Dkt. No. 1. On June 12, 2025, the
jury returned a verdict finding that Plaintiff had failed to prove his claim by a preponderance of
the evidence. Dkt. No. 66. On June 12, 2025, the Court entered a judgment in accordance with
the verdict. 	Dkt. No. 67. 	Presently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for a Bill of Costs
pursuant to Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Rule 54(d)), seeking a total of
$955.78 in costs associated with defending this action. Dkt. No. 68 (the Motion).1 Plaintiff did
not file an opposition. For the following reasons stated, Defendants’ Motion is granted.
II. 	STANDARD OF REVIEW
1 Unless otherwise noted, citations are to the pagination generated by CM/ECF docketing system.
Case 9:23-cv-00848-ECC-DJS Document 70 Filed 03/25/26 Page 1 of 4

2
“Pursuant to Rule 54(d)(1), only costs other than attorney’s fees should be allowed . . . to
the prevailing party unless the court directs otherwise.” Sacco v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., No. 05-
CV-1435, 2008 WL 2858652, at *1 (N.D.N.Y. July 22, 2008) (quoting Rule 54(d)(1) (quotation
marks omitted)). The costs that may be awarded are only those “authorized by statute or contract.”
Gallagher v. IBEW Local Union No. 43, No. 5:00-CV-1161, 2008 WL 5191691, at *1 (N.D.N.Y.
Dec. 10, 2008). The relevant statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1920 states:
A judge or clerk of any court of the United States may tax as costs the following:
(1) Fees of the clerk and marshal;
(2) Fees for printed or electronically recorded transcripts necessarily obtained for
use in the case;
(3) Fees and disbursements for printing and witnesses;
(4) Fees for exemplification and the costs of making copies of any materials where
the copies are necessarily obtained for use in the case;
(5) Docket fees under section 1923 of this title;
(6) Compensation of court appointed experts, compensation of interpreters, and
salaries, fees, expenses, and costs of special interpretation services under section
1828 of this title.
28 U.S.C. § 1920. See also United States District Court for the Northern District of New York
(N.D.N.Y) Guidelines for Bills of Costs §§ II(F)(1)(a)-(c), (e).
“In addition, because Rule 54(d) allows costs ‘as of course,’ such an award against the
losing party is the normal rule obtaining in civil litigation, not an exception.” Whitfield v. Scully,
241 F.3d 264, 270 (2d Cir. 2001) (citing Rule 54(d) and Mercy v. County of Suffolk, 748 F.2d 52,
54 (2d Cir. 1984), abrogated on other grounds, Bruce v. Samuels, 577 U.S. 82 (2016). “For this
reason, the losing party has the burden to show that costs should not be imposed; for example,
costs may be denied because of misconduct by the prevailing party, the public importance of the
case, the difficulty of the issues, or the losing party’s limited financial resources.” Id. (citations
omitted). “The decision to award costs to a prevailing party under Rule 54(d)(1) rests within the
sound discretion of the district court.” 	McEachin v. Goord, No. 9:01-CV-0259, 2007 WL
Case 9:23-cv-00848-ECC-DJS Document 70 Filed 03/25/26 Page 2 of 4

3
1571981, at *1 (N.D.N.Y. May 25, 2007) (citation omitted).
III. 	DISCUSSION
A. Witness Fees
Defendants seek $447.38 for witness fees for three non-party witnesses who testified at
trial: Marcia Rocque, Colin Fraser, and Ted Nesmith. 	Dkt. No. 68 at 3. 	For each of these
witnesses, Defendants seek the statutory witness attendance fee of $40.00 per day for a total of
$120.00. See 28 U.S.C. § 1821(b); see also New Skete Farms, Inc. v. Murray, No. 1:06-CV-486
(GLS/RFT), 2009 WL 10680320, at *3 (N.D.N.Y. Apr. 3, 2009) (“A prevailing party may recover
its witness costs at a rate of $40 for each day the witness gave testimony at a trial or deposition.”).
Defendants also seek $122 for overnight lodging, and that complies with the requirements
of 28 U.S.C. § 1821(d), and the GSA FY2025 Daily Lodge Rate for Syracuse, New York.2 Finally,
they seek $205.38 for mileage, and they calculated the mileage for each witness at a GSA rate of
$0.21 provided by 28 U.S.C. § 	1821(c)(2).3 Accordingly, Defendants’ request for costs in the
amount of $447.38 for witness fees is granted.
B. Transcript Fees
Defendants seek $508.40 in costs for Plaintiff’s February 12, 2024 deposition transcript.
Dkt. No. 68 at 4. “Generally speaking, the reasonable costs of transcribing depositions are properly
2 	See 	GSA 	FY 	2025 	Daily 	Lodging 	Rates 	for 	Syracuse, 	New 	York,
https://www.gsa.gov/travel/plan-book/per-diem-rates (last visited March 16, 2026).
3 For each witness, Defendants calculated a round trip to the James M. Hanley Federal Building,
100 S. Clinton, Street, Syracuse, NY 13261, from, for Roque, Washington Correction Facility, that
is 362 miles; for Fraser, from Cranberry Lake, NY, that is 288 miles; and for Nesmith, from
Queensbury, NY, that is 328 miles, all at the United States General Service Administration
(“GSA”) rate of $0.21 per mile for each of the non-party witnesses. 	See POV Mileage Rates
(Archived), 	United 	States 	General 	Services 	Administration, 	effective 	January 	1, 	2025,
https://www.gsa.gov/travel/plan-book/transportation-airfare-pov-etc/privately-owned-vehicle-
mileage-rates/pov-mileage-rates-archived (last visited March 16, 2026).
Case 9:23-cv-00848-ECC-DJS Document 70 Filed 03/25/26 Page 3 of 4

4
taxed in favor of the prevailing party.” Green v. Venettozzi, No. 9:14-CV-1215 (BKS/CFH), 2019
WL 4508927, at *1 (N.D.N.Y. Sept. 19, 2019) (citation omitted). Here, where “Plaintiff testified
at trial, the deposition transcript was necessary in order to cross-examine him (or to be prepared to
do so).” Yunus v. Jones, No. 9:15-CV-1282 (GTS), 2020 WL 3026238, at *3 (N.D.N.Y. June 5,
2020).
Accordingly, Defendants’ request for costs in the amount of $508.40 for transcript fees is
granted. See N.D.N.Y Guidelines for Bills of Costs §§ II(D)(1)(c)-(d).
IV. 	CONCLUSION
For these reasons, it is
ORDERED that the Motion for Bill of Costs, Dkt. No. 68, is GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on the
parties in accordance with the Local Rules.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 25, 2026
Case 9:23-cv-00848-ECC-DJS Document 70 Filed 03/25/26 Page 4 of 4