6:24-cv-00920•Nowicki v. Commissioner of Social Security
Texto completo
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOSEPH N., Plaintiff, v. 6:24-CV-920 (DJS) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: JOSEPH N. Plaintiff Pro Se Rome, New York 13440 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION VERNON NORWOOD, ESQ. Social Security Administration 6401 Security Boulevard Baltimore, Maryland 21235 DANIEL J. STEWART United States Magistrate Judge ORDER Plaintiff pro se has not filed a Brief in accordance with General Order 18 governing procedures in Social Security cases despite being afforded extensions to do so. Defendant Commissioner of Social Security was previously ordered to file a brief in support of the Commissioner’s position setting forth all contentions which Defendant believes entitles the Commissioner to relief, by December 5, 2025. Consistent with General Order 18 that response may also be a motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. N.D.N.Y General Order 18(D). That That deadline was tolled by operation of General Order 48 and the Court now sua sponte resets that deadline for January 16, 2026. Case 6:24-cv-00920-DJS Document 26 Filed 12/16/25 Page 1 of 2
2 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, that Defendant’s response shall be filed on or before January 16, 2026; and it is further ORDERED, that a copy of this Order shall be provided to the parties by the Clerk of the Court. Dated: December 16, 2025 Albany, New York Case 6:24-cv-00920-DJS Document 26 Filed 12/16/25 Page 2 of 2
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.