Case Name in Immigration Case - Unavailable

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
OLAKITAN ADETAYO BANJOKO,
also known as Banjoko Olakitan Adetayo,
Petitioner,
v.
No. 2:26-cv-00016-MIS-JMR
TODD 	BLANCHE, 	Acting 	Attorney
General, 	MARKWAYNE 	MULLIN,
Secretary of the Department of Homeland
Security, TODD LYONS, U.S. ICE Field
Officer Director for the El Paso Field Office,
and 	DORA 	CASTRO, 	Warden 	of 	Otero
County Processing Center,
Respondents.
ORDER ADOPTING PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION
GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PETITIONER’S PETITION FOR A
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Proposed Findings and Recommended
Disposition of United States Magistrate Judge Jennifer M. Rozzoni (“PFRD”), ECF No. 21, issued
March 17, 2026. Petitioner Olakitan Adetayo Banjoko filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,
ECF No. 1, on January 5, 2026. Respondents Markwayne Mullin, Todd Blanche, and Todd Lyons
(“Federal Respondents”),1 filed a Response on January 29, 2026, ECF No. 7. Petitioner filed an
Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 9, on January 30, 2026. The Court referred
1 	Respondent Dora Castro, Warden of Otero County Processing Center, did not file a response or
otherwise appear in this case. It has become standard practice in these habeas cases for the warden of the relevant
detention center to either appear and adopt the federal respondents’ arguments, see, e.g., Intriago-Sedgwick v. Noem,
Case No. 1:25-cv-01065-MIS-LF, Notice of Joinder In USA Respondents’ Forthcoming Claims and Defenses, ECF
No. 11 (D.N.M. Dec. 3, 2025), or not appear at all, see Francisco v. Dedos, Case No. 1:25-cv-01229-MIS-GJF,
Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition at 8, ECF No. 53 (D.N.M. Jan. 20, 2026).
Case 2:26-cv-00016-MIS-JMR Document 22 Filed 04/06/26 Page 1 of 3

2
this case to Magistrate Judge Jennifer M. Rozzoni on February 3, 2026. ECF Nos. 12, 13. Judge
Rozzoni issued her PFRD on March 17, 2026. ECF No. 21. Neither Party timely filed an objection.
Judge Rozzoni recommends that the Court find Petitioner subject to 8 U.S.C. § 1226, “‘the
default rule’ for detaining noncitizens ‘already present in the United States.’” PFRD at 10, ECF
No. 21 (citing Gonzalez Ramos v. Dedos, No. 1:25-CV-00975-MLG-KRS, 2025 WL 3653928, at
*3 (D.N.M. Dec. 17, 2025)). Judge Rozzoni believes this is the appropriate statute because
Respondents concede Petitioner is not under final removal yet argue Petitioner should be subject
to 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(1)(A), which only applies to detainees under final removal. Id. at 9. The
Court agrees, Petitioner is subject to § 1226.
The Court further concurs with Judge Rozzoni’s recommendation that the Court order a
bond hearing since, under § 1226, alien detainees must receive an individualized bond hearing at
the outset of detention. Id. at 10. And the Court concurs with Judge Rozzoni’s recommendation
that the Government bear the burden of proof because Petitioner has been detained in violation of
his right to due process. Id. at 10-11 (citing Velasquez Salazar v. Dedos, 806 F. Supp. 3d 1231,
1241-46 	(D.N.M. 	2025) 	(Urias, 	J.)). 	The 	Court 	also 	concurs 	with 	Judge 	Rozzoni’s
recommendation that Petitioner’s other requests be denied. Id. at 12-13.
The Court echoes Judge Rozzoni’s concerns with the lack of diligence displayed by
Respondents, and in particular Assistant Field Office Director Jose P. Ortez, in their conflicting
assertions regarding Petitioner’s visa status. Id. at 4-6. The volume of similar cases does not excuse
shoddy performance, especially where individual liberty is at stake. Further unexplained
discrepancies will not be tolerated.
The Court also shares Judge Rozzoni’s concerns about whether Petitioner voluntarily
waived his rights when he agreed to voluntarily depart. Id. at 6-8. While the Court concurs that it
Case 2:26-cv-00016-MIS-JMR Document 22 Filed 04/06/26 Page 2 of 3

3
lacks jurisdiction to review Petition’s claim of not knowingly and voluntarily waiving his rights,
it recommends the Board of Immigration Appeals and the Court of Appeals examine Petitioner’s
claim closely.
Therefore, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. 	The Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition issued by U.S. Magistrate
Judge Jennifer M. Rozzoni on March 17, 2026, ECF No. 21, is ADOPTED;
2. 	Respondents SHALL conduct a bond hearing within seven (7) days, at which the
Government bears the burden of proof and must prove by clear and convincing
evidence that Petitioner poses a flight risk or danger to the community;
3. 	In the event the Government fails to meet its burden, bond SHALL be set at an
amount Petitioner can reasonably afford;
4. 	If the Government fails to hold a bond hearing within seven (7) days, Petitioner
SHALL be released;
5. 	If Petitioner is released as a result of the bond hearing or failure to hold a bond
hearing within seven (7) days, Petitioner SHALL NOT be re-detained without a
pre-deprivation bond hearing before a neutral Immigration Judge pursuant to 8
U.S.C. § 1226(a), unless a final order of removal is entered in which case Petitioner
may be detained pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(2)(A); and
6. 	Petitioner’s other requests for relief, namely that the Court approve his pending
application for permanent residence, dismiss his deportation proceedings, and order
his immediate release, are DENIED.
………………………………………….
MARGARET STRICKLAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:26-cv-00016-MIS-JMR Document 22 Filed 04/06/26 Page 3 of 3