Saykaly v. Donovan et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Nicholas E. Saykaly
v.
Patrick E. Donovan, et. al.
Case No. 1:23-cv-289-SE-AJ
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated October
3, 2023 (doc. no. 9). For the reasons explained therein, plaintiff’s
case is dismissed.
“[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the
magistrate’s report are subject to review in the district court and
those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.” Sch.
Union No. 37 v. United Nat’l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir.
2010) (quotation omitted); see United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792
F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a
specific objection to magistrate’s report will waive the right to
appeal).
The following motions are denied as moot: 1) plaintiff’s motion
to participate in electronic filing (Doc. No. 3); 2) plaintiff’s
emergency motion to correct the record (Doc. No. 4); 3) plaintiff’s
motion to bring forward emergency motion (Doc. No. 7); and 4)
Case 1:23-cv-00289-SE-AJ Document 10 Filed 11/30/23 Page 1 of 2

plaintiff’s motion for clarification (Doc. No. 8).
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Samantha D. Elliott
United States District Judge
Date: November 30, 2023
cc: 	Nicholas E. Saykaly, pro se
Case 1:23-cv-00289-SE-AJ Document 10 Filed 11/30/23 Page 2 of 2