USA v. Casellas et al

1:15-cr-00178Nhd1 de out. de 2020

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
United States of America
v. Civil No. 15-cr-178-LM-03
Opinion No. 2020 DNH 174 P
Jeannette Hardy
O R D E R
Before the court is defendant Hardy’s motion (doc. no. 123), styled as a
motion for reconsideration. Despite its styling, the motion does not seek
reconsideration of any of the court’s orders in this action, including the court’s July
6, 2020 denial (without prejudice) of her motion for compassionate release under 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c). Instead, the motion seeks a reduction in Hardy’s sentence under
18 U.S.C. § 3742(e) due to Hardy’s post-sentencing rehabilitation efforts and
accomplishments. However, Section 3742 does not provide any authority for the
court to modify a defendant’s sentence based on post-sentencing rehabilitation. The
statutory provision governing sentence modification is, instead, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c).
Accordingly, the court construes Hardy’s motion as another motion for sentence
modification under Section 3582(c). Relief under Section 3582(c) is only available on
a defendant’s motion where the defendant first requests that the Bureau of Prisons
move for sentence reduction on the defendant’s behalf and then either exhausts all
available administrative rights to appeal the Bureau’s failure to file such a motion
or waits for the lapse of thirty days following the Bureau’s receipt of the defendant’s
Case 1:15-cr-00178-LM Document 124 Filed 10/01/20 Page 1 of 2
2
request. Hardy’s motion does not indicate that she has requested that the Bureau
move to reduce her sentence because of her post-sentence rehabilitation. In
addition, relief under Section 3582(c) is only available where “extraordinary and
compelling reasons warrant” a reduction in sentence, and while Hardy’s
rehabilitation efforts and accomplishments are commendable, they do not rise to the
level of extraordinary or compelling grounds to reduce her sentence. The court
therefore respectfully denies the motion.
SO ORDERED.
__________________________
Landya McCafferty
United States District Judge
October 1, 2020
cc: Jeannette Hardy, pro se
Counsel of Record
U.S. Probation
U.S. Marshal
Case 1:15-cr-00178-LM Document 124 Filed 10/01/20 Page 2 of 2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.