Malcolm McFall Babb

8:06-bk-03003Nceb26 de out. de 2009

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WILMINGTON DIVISION
IN RE:
MALCOLM MCFALL BABB,
DEBTOR.
CASE NO.
06-03003-8-JRL
_____________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
This matter is before the court on Brenda Babb’s motion for an order establishing an
equitable lien and an informal claim against the debtor. A hearing on this matter was held on
October 14, 2009, in Wilmington, North Carolina.
Brenda Babb, the debtor’s wife, has paid the property taxes on two properties in the
debtor’s estate. From 1988 through 2008 Mrs. Babb paid $1,008.30 in taxes on debtor’s
property identified as Lot 123, Section A, Foxwood Hills, Oconee County, South Carolina (“Lot
A”). During the same period, Mrs. Babb paid $4,892.76 on debtor’s property identified as Lot
52, Section D, Foxwood Hills, Oconee County, South Carolina (“Lot B”). Mrs. Babb argues that
the debtor verbally agreed that the properties would serve as a security for the payment of the
SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 26 day of October, 2009.
________________________________________
J. Rich Leonard
United States Bankruptcy Judge
____________________________________________________________
Case 06-03003-8-RDD Doc 459 Filed 10/26/09 Entered 10/26/09 12:49:23 Page 1 of 2
2
property taxes on Lots A and B and that she is therefore entitled to an equitable lien. She further
contends that she is entitled to an informal proof of claim based on the debtor’s liability for the
taxes she paid on his behalf.
Under South Carolina law, “[t]he elements of equitable subrogation are: (1) The party
claiming subrogation has paid the debt, (2) The party was not a volunteer but had a direct interest
in the discharge of the debt or lien, (3) The party was secondarily liable for the debt or for
discharge of the lien, [and] (4) No injustice will be done to the other party by the allowance of
the equity.” United Carolina Bank v. Caroprop, Ltd., 446 S.E.2d 415, 416 (S.C. 1994). Mrs.
Babb does not satisfy these elements because she volunteered to pay the debtor’s debts and was
not secondarily liable. Therefore, the court denies Mrs. Babb’s motion for an equitable lien.
Despite the inadequacy of her claim for an equitable lien, Mrs. Babb may be reimbursed
by the debtor’s bankruptcy estate for any property taxes that came due and that she paid
subsequent to the debtor’s initial bankruptcy petition filed on September 22, 2006. Provided that
she can document the payment of such taxes, Mrs. Babb is entitled to file an administrative claim
against the estate under 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B).
Based on the foregoing, the court denies Mrs. Babb’s motion for an order establishing an
equitable lien. However, the court recognizes Mrs. Babb’s right to file an administrative claim
against the bankruptcy estate for any property tax payments that she can show were expenses of
the estate subsequent to the debtor’s bankruptcy petition filed on September 22, 2006.
“END OF DOCUMENT”
Case 06-03003-8-RDD Doc 459 Filed 10/26/09 Entered 10/26/09 12:49:23 Page 2 of 2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.