USA v. White

4:24-cr-00532Moed27 de out. de 2025

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	No. 4:24-CR-532 HEA
)
IRVEN WHITE, 	)
)
Defendant. 	)
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Irven White’s objections to the
Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John M.
Bodenhausen. (ECF No. 59). 	The objections were originally filed out of time by
Defendant White without the assistance of counsel. 	On October 16, 2025,
Defendant White’s newly appointed counsel filed a motion requesting the Court to
consider Defendant White’s untimely objections, which the Court granted. 	(ECF
Nos. 68 and 86).
In his August 4, 2025 Report and Recommendation, Judge Bodenhausen
recommends that Defendant’s Omnibus Motion to Dismiss the Indictment, as
supplemented, be denied. 	(ECF Nos. 38 and 51). 	When a party objects to the
magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Court must conduct a de novo
review of the portions of the report, findings, or recommendations to which the
party objects. See United States v. Lothridge, 324 F.3d 599, 600 (8th Cir. 2003)
Case: 4:24-cr-00532-HEA Doc. #: 87 Filed: 10/27/25 Page: 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>
2
(citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). The Court has reviewed the record and
independently considered Defendant White’s objections and has determined that
the objections are without merit. 	The Court is in full agreement with the stated
rationale of the Magistrate Judge's recommendations and will adopt the same.
After de novo review, this Court adopts the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations
in full. 	Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Irven White’s Objections are
OVERRULED. 	[ECF No. 59]
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of
United 	States 	Magistrate 	Judge 	John 	M. 	Bodenhausen 	is 	SUSTAINED,
ADOPTED, and INCORPORATED herein. [ECF No. 56]
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Irven White’s Motion to
Dismiss, as supplemented, is DENIED. 	[ECF Nos. 38 & 51]
Dated this 27 th day of October, 2025.
________________________________
HENRY EDWARD AUTREY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case: 4:24-cr-00532-HEA Doc. #: 87 Filed: 10/27/25 Page: 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.