Case Name in Immigration Case - Unavailable

0:26-cv-01312Mnd11 de fev. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
ANGEL ROGELIO ANDRADE
SUQUILANDA,
Petitioner,
vs.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
United States Department of Justice,
et al.,
Respondents.
0:26-CV-1312
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT
OF HABEAS CORPUS
The petitioner is a noncitizen currently detained by U.S. Immigration
and Customs Enforcement (ICE), seeking a writ of habeas corpus under 28
U.S.C. § 2241. The petitioner contends their detention is unlawful due to denial
of a bond hearing pursuant to 8 C.F.R. §§ 236.1(d)(1) and 1236.1(d)(1). See
filing 1. The government responds that detention is mandatory, not
discretionary, and the petitioner is not eligible to be released. See filing 5.
The briefing demonstrates that the petitioner's application for the writ
only presents issues of law—and the government does not dispute this point,
having been directed to address it, see filing 3 at 2; filing 5—so the Court
declines to hold a hearing. See § 2243. The Court will grant the petition for the
reasons thoroughly articulated by this Court in Velasco Hurtado v. Bondi, No.
0:26-CV-546, 2026 WL 184884 (D. Minn. Jan. 24, 2026).1
1 A petitioner seeking release from immigration detention shall be awarded costs and
reasonable attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. §
2412(d), unless the Court finds that the government's position was substantially justified or
CASE 0:26-cv-01312-JMG-DLM Doc. 6 Filed 02/11/26 Page 1 of 3
2
As a fallback position, the government argues that even if the petitioner
falls under § 1226(a), the appropriate relief is a bond hearing and not outright
release, because the petitioner is subject to an administrative arrest warrant.
See filing 5; filing 5-1. But the government does not dispute that the petitioner
was detained upon his arrival in the United States in 2023, and released on
recognizance. Filing 1 at 11-12. The government has provided no evidence that
an immigration officer exercised discretion to revoke the petitioner's release,
or conducted a custody redetermination until after arresting him. Accordingly,
for the reasons explained in Duarte Salazar v. Noem, No. 26-cv-1040, slip. op.
at 2-3 (D. Minn. Feb. 11, 2026), the Court finds that the government's
administrative warrant does not justify revoking the petitioner's prior release
on recognizance, and that outright release from his present confinement is the
appropriate remedy. The government shall immediately—if necessary—return
the petitioner to the state of Minnesota and release the petitioner from custody.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing 1) is granted.
that special circumstances make an award unjust. See Michelin v. Warden Moshannon Valley
Corr. Ctr., No. 24-2990, 2026 WL 263483 (3d Cir. Feb. 2, 2026); see also, e.g., Yeferson G.C. v.
Easterwood, No. 25-CV-4814, 2026 WL 207266, at *3 (D. Minn. Jan. 21), report and
recommendation adopted, 2026 WL 209825 (D. Minn. Jan. 27, 2026); Mairena-Munguia v.
Arnott, No. 25-CV-3318, 2025 WL 3229132, at *5 (W.D. Mo. Nov. 19, 2025); cf. Bah v.
Cangemi, 548 F.3d 680 (8th Cir. 2008) (evaluating the merits of immigration habeas
petitioner's EAJA claim). Any motion for costs and fees pursuant to the EAJA in this case
should be filed within 30 days of the entry of judgment. See § 2412(d)(1)(B).
CASE 0:26-cv-01312-JMG-DLM Doc. 6 Filed 02/11/26 Page 2 of 3
3
2. The government shall, if necessary, immediately return the
petitioner to the District of Minnesota.
3. When the petitioner is in Minnesota, the government shall
immediately release the petitioner from custody with no new
conditions, and shall return any personal property seized
from the petitioner when detained.
4. No later than February 13, 2026, the government shall file
a status report certifying compliance with this Order.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated this 11th day of February, 2026.
BY THE COURT:
John M. Gerrard
Senior United States District Judge
CASE 0:26-cv-01312-JMG-DLM Doc. 6 Filed 02/11/26 Page 3 of 3

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.