Lockhart v. St. Louis Park Police Department et al

0:25-cv-03555Mnd8 de jan. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CHARLES CALVIN LOCKHART,
Plaintiff,
v.
ST. LOUIS PARK POLICE
DEPARTMENT, DETECTIVE ALLISON
JONES, JOHN DOE 1, and JOHN DOE 2,
Defendants.
Case No. 25‐CV‐3555 (NEB/DTS)
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
The Court has received the November 20, 2025 Report and Recommendation of
United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (ECF No. 12.) No party has objected to
that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above‐
captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. 	The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 12) is ACCEPTED;
2. 	The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
3. 	Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED
AS MOOT; and
4. 	Plaintiff’s Motion for Rule 34(a) Request for Production of Documents and
Video (ECF No. 4) is DENIED AS MOOT.
CASE 0:25-cv-03555-NEB-DTS Doc. 13 Filed 01/08/26 Page 1 of 2
2
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: January 8, 2026 	BY THE COURT:
s/Nancy E. Brasel
Nancy E. Brasel
United States District Judge
CASE 0:25-cv-03555-NEB-DTS Doc. 13 Filed 01/08/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.