Williams v. Rardin

0:25-cv-02302Mnd2 de fev. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Joseph Williams, FMC – Rochester, PMB 4000, Rochester, MN 55903, Pro Se
Petitioner.
Ana H. Voss, Lucas B. Draisey, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, 300
South 4 th Street, Suite 600, Minneapolis, MN 55415, for Defendant.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge
David T. Schultz dated November 3, 2025 (Docket No. [14]), along with all the files and
records, and because no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Petitioner Joseph Williams’ Amended Habeas Petition (Docket No.
[9]) be DENIED; and
2. This matter be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
JOSEPH WILLIAMS,
Petitioner,
v.
JARED RARDIN, Warden.
Defendant.
Civil No. 25-2302 (JRT/DTS)
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
CASE 0:25-cv-02302-JRT-DTS Doc. 15 Filed 02/02/26 Page 1 of 2
-2-
DATED: February, 2, 2026 	_____/s/ John R. Tunheim_____
at Minneapolis, Minnesota. 	JOHN R. TUNHEIM
United States District Judge
CASE 0:25-cv-02302-JRT-DTS Doc. 15 Filed 02/02/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.