0:24-cv-04337•Maestas v. Eischen
Texto completo
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ELESAIO BEN GUZM MAESTAS, Petitioner, v. B. EISCHEN, Warden, Respondent. Case No. 24‐CV‐4337 (NEB/SGE) ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Court has received the October 9, 2025 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elkins (ECF No. 12.) No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above‐captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 12) is ACCEPTED; 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED; and 3. The action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: January 13, 2026 BY THE COURT: s/Nancy E. Brasel Nancy E. Brasel United States District Judge CASE 0:24-cv-04337-NEB-SGE Doc. 13 Filed 01/13/26 Page 1 of 1
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.