Roth v. 3M Company et al

0:16-cv-00384Mnd13 de abr. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
In re: BAIR HUGGER FORCED AIR 	MDL No. 15-2666 (JNE/DTS)
WARMING DEVICES PRODUCTS 	ORDER
LIABILITY LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
Case No. 16-cv-384 (Naomi Roth v. 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.)
Case No. 16-cv-545 (Brenda Sanchez, on behalf of the Estate of Robert Andras, Sr. v. 3M
Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.)
Case No. 16-cv-3242 (Wanda Lantz v. 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.)
In a Report and Recommendation dated January 23, 2026, the Honorable David T.
Schultz, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that Case Nos. 16-cv-384, 16-cv-
545, and 16-cv-3242 be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. No
objection has been filed. Based on a de novo review of the record, see Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b), the Court accepts the recommended disposition [Docket No. 20 in Case No. 16-cv-
384; Docket No. 21 in Case No. 16-cv-545; Docket No. 12 in Case No. 16-cv-3242].
Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. 	Case Nos. 16-cv-384, 16-cv-545, and 16-cv-3242 are DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: April 10, 2026
s/Joan N. Ericksen
JOAN N. ERICKSEN
United States District Judge
CASE 0:16-cv-00384-JNE-DTS Doc. 21 Filed 04/13/26 Page 1 of 1

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.