Simpson #825815 v. Zampese et al

2:25-cv-00074Miwd26 de mar. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

CEDRIC SIMPSON #825815,
Plaintiff,
v
C/O STEVEN ZAMPESE, et al.,
Defendants.
NO. 2:25-cv-74
MAG. JUDGE RAY KENT
Cedric Simpson #825815
In Pro Per
Ionia Correctional Facility
1576 W. Bluewater Hwy
Ionia, MI 48846
Nicholas Pillow (P83927)
Chapman Law Group
Attorney for Defendant Faulk
1141 W. Long Lake Rd, Ste 310
Troy, MI 48098
(248) 644-6326
npillow@chapmanlawgroup.com
Jessica E. Pelto (P71052)
Assistant Attorney General
Attorney for MDOC Defendant Zampese
Michigan Department of Attorney
General
Corrections Division
P.O. Box 30217
Lansing, MI 48909
(517) 335-3055
peltoj@michigan.gov
/
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
This matter having come before the Court on the parties’ stipulation, the
Court being fully apprised in the premises,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. 	Scope. All materials produced or adduced in this action shall be
subject to this order concerning Confidential Documents as defined below.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
NORTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:25-cv-00074-RJJ-RSK ECF No. 29, PageID.<pageID> Filed 03/26/26 Page 1
of 5
2
2. 	Confidential Documents. When used in this order, “Confidential
Documents” means documents of a type contemplated by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) that a
party, in good faith, regards as confidential, sensitive business or personal
information, including medical records. The Michigan Department of Corrections
(MDOC), in good faith, regards certain documents to be confidential because
disclosure of such information is potentially harmful to the safety, security, and
good order of Michigan’s prison system and the safety of MDOC employees.
3. 	All confidential documents, as that term is defined by Paragraph 2,
shall be used solely for the prosecution and/or defense of this action, including any
appeal(s) resulting from this action.
4. 	The parties and counsel for the parties shall not disclose or
permit the disclosure of any confidential information to any person currently or
formerly under the jurisdiction of the MDOC, copies of the records shall not be
provided to or discussed with them without MDOC’s permission granted pursuant
to this order. Except as provided in Paragraphs 5, no document designated as
confidential, and no information contained in a confidential document, may be
disclosed to any person other than:
a. 	The parties (unless currently or formerly under the jurisdiction of
the MDOC);
b. 	Counsel for the parties;
c. 	Secretaries, paralegal, assistants, and other employees
of such counsel who are actively engaged in assisting counsel in
the preparation of this action;
d. 	The Court and its personnel;
Case 2:25-cv-00074-RJJ-RSK ECF No. 29, PageID.<pageID> Filed 03/26/26 Page 2
of 5
3
e. 	Persons noticed for deposition or persons who may be
designated as witnesses, including outside consultants and
experts retained for the purpose of assisting in the preparation
of this action (whether or not said outside consultant or expert is
retained to testify in this action), subject to the provisions of
Paragraph 7;
f. 	Any facilitator/mediator who the parties have agreed to
use in this case or ordered by the Court;
g. 	Any person already in lawful and legitimate possession of such
confidential information; or
h. 	Court reporters used in this case.
5. 	Except for the parties, counsel for the parties in this action, and their
employees, secretaries, and paralegals, and the Court and its employees covered by
the provisions of Paragraph 4a, 4b, 4c, and 4d, disclosure to other persons shall be
made only upon the condition that the party disclosing the confidential document
shall inform the person to whom it is disclosed that the document is subject to this
Protective Order and that he or she: (a) shall not use, directly or indirectly, any
information from any confidential documents for purposes other than the
prosecution or defense of this action; (b) shall not copy or duplicate, in any form,
any confidential documents or information from any confidential documents; or (c)
disclose such information to any person who is not permitted to receive such
documents and information under the terms of this Protective Order.
6. 	Confidential Information Subpoenaed or Ordered to be
Produced in Other Litigation.
If a receiving party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other
litigation that would compel disclosure of any material or document designated in
Case 2:25-cv-00074-RJJ-RSK ECF No. 29, PageID.<pageID> Filed 03/26/26 Page 3
of 5
4
this action as Confidential, the receiving party must notify the MDOC, in writing,
immediately and in no event more than three business days after receiving the
subpoena or order. Such notification must include a copy of the subpoena or court
order. The receiving party also must immediately inform in writing the party who
caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all the
material covered by the subpoena or order is the subject of this order. In addition,
the receiving party must deliver a copy of this order promptly to the party in the
other action that caused the subpoena to issue. The receiving party shall not
produce the Confidential without order from this Court or from another court of
competent jurisdiction.
7. 	Persons covered by the provisions of Paragraph 4e should immediately
turn over any confidential documents to the producing party once their reason for
the disclosure has been satisfied. If any information or contents of a confidential
document are disclosed in a deposition or court proceeding, the court reporter may
retain a copy of the confidential document along with any transcript(s) of the
deposition subject to the provisions of Paragraph 5.
8. 	If any party proposes to or intends to use confidential documents in
any court filings, during a hearing, or at trial, that party shall give reasonable
notice, based on the circumstances, to the designating party of such intended use to
allow the designating party an opportunity to petition the Court to institute
appropriate procedures to maintain the confidentiality of the materials to be used
as provided in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The party designating the
Case 2:25-cv-00074-RJJ-RSK ECF No. 29, PageID.<pageID> Filed 03/26/26 Page 4
of 5
5
document as Confidential pursuant to this order may waive the confidentiality
designation at any time by providing written notice to the opposing party, or by
express oral waiver of such designation during a deposition or other proceeding on
the record.
9. 	Challenges to Confidentiality. A party may challenge the
designation of confidentiality by motion. The designating party bears the burden of
proving that the information, documents, or other material at issue are properly
designated as confidential. Until the Court rules on the challenge, all parties shall
continue to treat the materials as confidential under the terms of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 26, 2026 /s/ Ray Kent
RAY KENT
United States Magistrate Judge
The undersigned parties agree and stipulate to entry of the above Stipulated
Protective Order.
Date: March 20, 2026 	/s/ Nicholas Pillow (w/consent)
Nicholas Pillow
Counsel for Defendant Faulk
Date: March 19, 2026 	/s/Jessica E. Pelto
Jessica E. Pelto
Counsel for Defendants
Case 2:25-cv-00074-RJJ-RSK ECF No. 29, PageID.<pageID> Filed 03/26/26 Page 5
of 5

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.