Blaylock #895020 v. Burgess et al

1:25-cv-00757Miwd11 de mai. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JAMES BLAYLOCK,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL BURGESS, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________/
Case No. 1:25-cv-757
Hon. Hala Y. Jarbou
ORDER
On April 24, 2026, Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat issued a Report and
Recommendation (R&R) that the Court deny Defendant Boerema’s motion for summary
judgment. (R&R, ECF No. 22.) The R&R was duly served on the parties. No objections have
been filed, and the deadline for doing so has expired. On review, the Court concludes that the
R&R correctly analyzes the issues and makes a sound recommendation.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (ECF No. 22) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the
opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Boerema’s motion for summary judgment
(ECF No. 15) is DENIED.
Dated: May 11, 2026 /s/ Hala Y. Jarbou
HALA Y. JARBOU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 1:25-cv-00757-HYJ-MV ECF No. 23, PageID.<pageID> Filed 05/11/26 Page 1
of 1

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.