Hamilton v. Vorce et al

1:22-cv-00336Miwd6 de jan. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ALEXANDER HAMILTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
CHAD VORCE, et al.,
Defendants.
_______________________/
Case No. 1:22-cv-336
HON. JANE M. BECKERING
ORDER
This is a civil action. Defendants City of DeWitt, Clyde Smith, and Bruce Ferguson filed
a Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 32). Defendant Chad Vorce also filed a Motion to Dismiss (ECF
No. 54). 	The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and
Recommendation (ECF No. 58) on December 12, 2025, recommending that the motions be granted
and that this case be dismissed with prejudice. The Report and Recommendation was duly served
on the parties that have appeared to date. 	No objections have been filed. 	See 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1). Accordingly:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF. No. 58) is
APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 32 & 54) are
GRANTED for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order.
Dated: January 6, 2026 	/s/ Jane M. Beckering
JANE M. BECKERING
United States District Judge
Case 1:22-cv-00336-JMB-RSK ECF No. 59, PageID.<pageID> Filed 01/06/26 Page 1
of 1

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.