Jack et al v. Progressive Insurance Company et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
DAMION JACK
VERSUS
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE
COMPANY, ET AL.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
CIVIL ACTION NO. 25-845
SECTION: “P”(1)
JUDGE DARREL JAMES PAPILLION
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JANIS VAN MEERVELD
*********************************** 	*
ORDER
The Court, after considering the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation (R. Doc. 23), and finding that as of this date the parties have
filed no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, hereby approves the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims against defendant Tomeka M. Huff are
DISMISSED for failure to state a claim, and plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Rec. Doc. 9) is
DENIED.
Because the claims against defendant Huff have now been dismissed in connection with
the motion to remand and improper joinder analysis, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that
defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (R. Doc. 21), which requests the dismissal of plaintiff’s claims
against Tomeka M. Huff, is DENIED AS MOOT.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 8th day of December 2025.
________________________________
DARREL JAMES PAPILLION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:25-cv-00845-DJP-JVM Document 26 Filed 12/08/25 Page 1 of 1