Harold v. Joshlin et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
SANCHAZ HAROLD 	CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS 	NO. 25-792
JORDAN JOSHLIN, et al. 	SECTION M (5)
ORDER
Having considered the record, the applicable law, the magistrate judge’s partial Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”),1 and the plaintiff’s failure to file any objections to the R&R, the Court
hereby approves the R&R and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims against Jordan Joshlin and Terry Lane are
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to effect service under Rule 4(m) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 31st day of March, 2026.
BARRY W. ASHE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1 R. Doc. 34.
Case 2:25-cv-00792-BWA-MBN Document 36 Filed 03/31/26 Page 1 of 1