USA v. Cebreros et al

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v. 	Case No. 23-CR-10125-2-JWB
MARIO DE JESUS AHUMADA-ADAME,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the court on Defendant’s motion for “Disposition of Pending Charges
Pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act.” 	(Doc. 54.) 	The government filed a
response. (Doc. 55.) Defendant’s motion is DENIED.
Mr. Ahumada-Adame was sentenced by this court on January 22, 2025, to 60 months in
prison followed by a five-year term of supervised release for possession with intent to distribute
methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). (Doc. 52.) He now petitions the court to
dispose of certain “matters” pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act of 1970
(“IAD”). (Doc. 54 at 1.) By “matters” the court believes Defendant means “detainers” under the
IAD. 	(Id.) 	He requests that “any and all unserved warrants be served” on him at his current
address. (Id.)
Congress enacted the IAD to promote speedy resolution of outstanding charges and
detainers lodged against prisoners. See 18 U.S.C. App. 2 § 2. Defendant has not identified any
outstanding charges against him in his motion.
The government filed a response pointing out that there are no pending charges against
Defendant in this case or the District of Kansas. 	(Id. at 3.) 	The government avers that the
Case 6:23-cr-10125-JWB Document 56 Filed 11/19/25 Page 1 of 2

2
Defendant does have an immigration detainer but correctly points out that this court lacks
jurisdiction over such matters and the IAD Defendant references does not apply to immigration
detainers. (Id.); see Foster v. Geither, No. 23-CV-3089, 2023 WL 2756189 at *2 (D. Kan. Apr.
3, 2023). Because of the foregoing, Defendant’s motion is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 19th day of November, 2025.
s/ John W. Broomes
JOHN W. BROOMES
CHIEF 	UNITED 	STATES 	DISTRICT
JUDGE
Case 6:23-cr-10125-JWB Document 56 Filed 11/19/25 Page 2 of 2