5:25-cv-04031•Case Name in Social Security Case - Unavailable
Texto completo
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS JOSEPH LEE JONES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CIVIL ACTION v. ) ) No. 25-4031-JWL FRANK BISIGNANO, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________________) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the court is Plaintiff’s “Response” (Doc. 44) to the court’s January 8, 2026, Memorandum and Order affirming the Commissioner’s final decision in Plaintiff’s case as it relates to past due benefits. (Doc. 42). In his Response (deemed a Motion for an Order), Plaintiff alleges the agency has instructed his representative payee not to provide Plaintiff with any proceeds of his previously paid past due benefits while he remains confined. (Doc. 44). Plaintiff asks the court to order his representative payee to send him money for hygiene, stamps, food and other incidentals, and to order the Social Security Administration to tell the representative payee to allow him access to money from his bank account. Id. 2. Plaintiff’s representative payee was not a party to Plaintiff’s claim for judicial review in this case and access to past due benefits already in the hands of the Case 5:25-cv-04031-JWL Document 45 Filed 02/11/26 Page 1 of 2
2 representative payee was not an issue presented to the court in either Plaintiff’s Complaint or Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint. Therefore, it is too late to implead another defendant or to raise additional issues after the case has been litigated and judgment has been entered. This case is over, and the matter is closed. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for an Order (“Response,” Doc. 44) is DENIED. Dated February 11, 2026, at Kansas City, Kansas. s:/ John W. Lungstrum _ John W. Lungstrum United States District Judge Case 5:25-cv-04031-JWL Document 45 Filed 02/11/26 Page 2 of 2
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.