Jensen (ID 2100211417) v. Backman et al

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
JOSHUA JENSEN,
Plaintiff,
v. 	CASE NO. 25-3279-JWL
JUSTIN BACKMAN, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is a pro se civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 	Plaintiff is
incarcerated at the Lansing Correctional Facility in Lansing, Kansas. Plaintiff claims that hearing
officers in his disciplinary proceedings at the Norton Correctional Facility failed to follow Kansas
regulations, denied him due process, and failed to provide him with a licensed attorney. (Doc. 1,
at 1–3.)
The Court finds that Plaintiff is subject to the “three-strikes” provision under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(g). 	Court records establish that Plaintiff “has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while
incarcerated . . . , brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on
the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted.”1 	Accordingly, he may proceed in forma pauperis only if he establishes a threat of
“imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
1 Prior to filing the instant Complaint, the Court finds at least 3 prior civil actions filed by Plaintiff which qualify as
“strikes” under § 1915(g). See Jensen v. Zmuda, Case No. 25-3178-JWL, Doc. 10 (D. Kan. Oct. 6, 2025) (dismissed
for failure to state a claim); Jensen v. Trump, Case No. 25-3179-JWL, Doc. 6 (D. Kan. Sept. 3, 2025) (dismissed for
failure to state a claim); Jensen v. Brown, Case No. 25-3180-JWL, Doc. 12 (D. Kan. Oct. 3, 2025) (dismissed for
failure to state a claim); Jensen v. Trump, Case No. 25-3181-JWL, Doc. 6 (D. Kan. Sept. 3, 2025) (dismissed as
frivolous); Jensen v. Martin, Case No. 25-3182-JWL, Doc. 13 (D. Kan. Nov. 5, 2025) (dismissed for failure to state a
claim); Jensen v. Zmuda, Case No. 25-3191-JWL, Doc. 8 (D. Kan. Nov. 5, 2025) (dismissed for failure to state a
claim); Jensen v. Zmuda, Case No. 25-3192-JWL, Doc. 8 (D. Kan. Nov. 7, 2025) (dismissed for failure to state a
claim); Jensen v. Zmuda, Case No. 25-3195-JWL, Doc. 8 (D. Kan. Nov. 10, 2025) (dismissed for failure to state a
claim); Jensen v. Zmuda, Case No. 25-3211-JWL, Doc. 2 (D. Kan. Oct. 6, 2025) (dismissed as frivolous or malicious);
Case 5:25-cv-03279-JWL Document 2 Filed 12/31/25 Page 1 of 3

2
“To meet the only exception to the prepayment requirement, a prisoner who has accrued
three strikes must make ‘specific, credible allegations of imminent danger of serious physical
harm.’” 	Davis v. GEO Group Corr., 696 F. App’x 851, 854 (10th Cir. 2017) (unpublished)
(quoting Hafed v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 635 F.3d 1172, 1179 (10th Cir. 2011)). “Vague and
utterly conclusory assertions are insufficient.” Id. The harm must be imminent or occurring at the
time the complaint is filed, “allegations of past harm do not suffice.” Id. (citations omitted). 	The
“imminent danger” exception has a temporal limitation—[t]he exception is construed narrowly
and available only ‘for genuine emergencies,’ where ‘time is pressing’ and ‘a threat . . . is real and
proximate.’” 	Lynn v. Roberts, No. 11-3073-JAR, 2011 WL 3667171, at *2 (D. Kan. Aug. 22,
2011) (citation omitted). “Congress included an exception to the ‘three strikes’ rule for those cases
in which it appears that judicial action is needed as soon as possible to prevent serious physical
injuries from occurring in the meantime.’” Id. (citation omitted).
The Court has examined the Complaint and finds no showing of imminent danger of
serious physical injury. 	Accordingly, pursuant to § 1915(g) Plaintiff may not proceed in forma
pauperis in this civil action. Plaintiff is given time to pay the full $405.00 district court filing fee2
to the Court. 	If he fails to pay the full fee within the prescribed time, the Complaint will be
dismissed based upon Plaintiff’s failure to satisfy the statutory district court filing fee required by
28 U.S.C. § 1914.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that Plaintiff is denied leave to
proceed in forma pauperis.
Jensen v. Proffitt, Case No. 25-3212-JWL, Doc. 7 (D. Kan. Nov. 7, 2025) (dismissed for failure to state a claim); and
Jensen v. Shepack, Case No. 25-3213-JWL, Doc. 7 (D. Kan. Nov. 5, 2025) (dismissed for failure to state a claim).
2 If a person is not granted in forma pauperis status under § 1915, the fee to file a non-habeas civil action includes the
$350.00 fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) and a $55.00 general administrative fee pursuant to § 1914(b) and the
District Court Miscellaneous Fee Schedule prescribed by the Judicial Conference of the United States.
Case 5:25-cv-03279-JWL Document 2 Filed 12/31/25 Page 2 of 3

3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted until January 26, 2026, to submit
the $405.00 filing fee. The failure to submit the fee by that date will result in the dismissal of this
matter without prejudice and without additional prior notice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated December 31, 2025, in Kansas City, Kansas.
S/ John W. Lungstrum
JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 5:25-cv-03279-JWL Document 2 Filed 12/31/25 Page 3 of 3