IN RE: Standard Screws Antitrust LItigation

Case MDL No. 443 Document 2 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 2
JUNC PRT yy Sen
MULES T A Tio pe BE
CHES . TL
OCT	10 1350 ‘Yo, CoDOCKET NO. 443 PATO: sn EE
CLERF	OF THFapar ABEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION = 'i=F~hel
IN RE STANDARD SCREWS ANTITRUST LITIGATION :
TRANSFER ORDER FR
1/ All parties to the actions listed on the attached Schedule SERENEA=" either agree on the desirability of or do not oppose EER CL
transferring, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407, the actions pending EERIE
in districts other than the District of Massachusetts to [IEEE IE
that district for coordinated or consolidated pretrial pro-
ceedings with the actions pending there. The Papel hasfound upon consideration of the papers submitted?’ that
these actions involve common questions of fact and that }
transfer will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses : Co .
and promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. CC
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. : oo
§1407, the actions listed on the attached Schedule A and SE
pending in districts other than the District of Massachusetts i
be, and the same hereby are, transferred to that district ’
and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable wo
Andrew A. Caffrey for coordinated or consolidated pretrial :
proceedings with the actions pending in that district and .
listed on Schedule A. ) Porto
FOR THE PANEL: oo
Andrew A. Caffrey A / SEChairman Co
1l/ On September 24, 1980, plaintiff in S. Simon Hardware
Co. v. Amtel, Inc., et al., D. Mass., C.A. No. 80-1947-C,
filed a motion with the Panel to intervene in the proceedings
presently before the Panel. . In the motion, plaintiff states
that it subscribes to the representations made in the movants' Co
Section 1407 transfer motion and the arguments contained
in the "Brief For Moving Parties." In as much as all of : oo
the defendants named in the Simon complaint do not oppose }
the motion to centralize, plaintiff's motion to intervene .
is granted and we are including plaintiff's action on Schedule ERE
A. . . B
2/ The parties waived oral argument and, accordingly, the
question of transfer of these actions under Section 1407 oo
was submitted on the briefs. Rule 14, R.P.J.P.M.L., 78 :
F.R.D. 561, 572 (1978).

Schedule	Ariled 05/18/15 Page 2 of 2
. 7 mpr-443C	MBE 1 EEANDRRD SCREWS. ANT TRdoT LITIGATION===	ori lo ANTITRUST LITIGATION
District of District of Columbia
Allied Bolt, Inc, wv, Amtel, Inc., et al., :
C.A. No. 80-2015
( Northern District of Tllinois- Lurve & Co,, Inc., Vv. Amtel, Inc., et al.,
C.A. No. 80-C-4196
District of Massachusetts
Jack's Products Co., Inc. v. Amtel, Inc., et al., -
. C.A. No. 80-1708-C
Big D Building Supply Corp. v. Amtel, Inc., et al.,C.A. No. 80-17777-C
Southland Mower Co., Inc. v. Amtel, Inc., et al., :C.A. No. 80-1630-C
Square D. Company, Inc. Vv. Amtel, Inc., et al.,C.A. No. 80-1652-C ;
Glenwood Mfg., Inc. v. Amtel, Inc., et al.,
C.A. No. 80-1776 Cd
S. Simons Hardware Co. v. Amtel, Inc., et al.,
C.A. No. 80-1947-C :
District of Minnesota
Benoit, Inc. v. Amtel, Inc., et al.,
C.A., No. 3-80-477 :
Eastern District of New York
- Allmetal Screw Products Co., Inc. v. Amtel, Tnc., et al.,
C.A. No. 80-2182 (acre) -
Southern District of New York . So
Jefferson Screw and Bolt Industries, Inc. v. Amtel, Inc.,
et al., C.A. No. 80-CIV-4264 (RWS)
@® Eastern District of PennsylvaniaStrick Corp. v. Amtel, Inc., et al.,
C.A. No. 80-3111 :
Stanley Hardware Co,, Inc. v. Amtel, Inc., et al.,
C.A. No. 80-2789
Hardward Supply Co. v. Amtel, Inc., et al.,
C.A. No. 80-3126 :
J, Heller & Sons, Inc. v. Amtel, Inc., et al.,
C.A. No. 80-3082 :
Merchants Hardware Co., Inc. v. Amtel, Inc., et al.,
C.A. No. 80-3116 }
- Bethlehem Furniture Mfg. Corp. v. Amtel, Inc., et al.,C.A. No. 80-3122
Thomas Body Parts, Inc. v. Amtel, Inc., et al.,
C.A. No. 80-3149
Southern District of Texas
Universal Fastner Co. v. Amtel, Inc., et al.,
C.A. No. H-80-1808
-Eastern District of Wisconsin
Northwestern Company v. Amtel, Inc., et al.,
C.A. No. 80-C-746