IN RE: Ampicillin Antitrust Litigation

5/26/70 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND NOTICE OF HEARING - 6/26/70, Washington, D. C.
. Copies to counsel (certified mail, return receipt); involved judges;
hearing clerk.
6/5/70 / FILED MOTION TO VACATE AND POSTPONE HEARING by U.S.A. .
6/9/70 Z Ltr fr defendants requesting extension of time to respond to sco. ®
6/10/70 Order granting ext. for all responses to sco to & incl. 6/15/70
6/10/70 Order denying motion of U.S. to vacate and postpone 6/26 hearing.
6/10/70 3% Amendment to SCO adding "B" cases; sent certifed mail, return receipt to involved
counsel; involved judges; hearing clerk; and court reporter.
6/10/70 Y Memo of Certain Plaintiffs (Biocraft Laboratories, States of La., Vermont,
: Florida & City of New York) Responding to OSC.
6/11/70 5 Response of State of Indiana. C6/12/70 & Brief of U. S. in Response to Panel's Order.
6/15/70 7 Brief of Plaintiff Richard Estey d/b/a Rex Pharmacy (D.C.
6/17/70 % Brief and Supporting Affidavit of Def. Bristol-Myers Co. Beecham Group Ltd.,
& Beecham, Inc. (with proof of service).
6/19/70 G Response of plaintiffs Biocraft Laboratories, City of New York, State ofFlorida, State of Vermont, State of Louisiana.
6/23/70 /O Response of Plaintiffs Lee's Prescription Shops, Inc., Hospital Development
& Service Corp., North Miami General Hospital, Inc.
6/26/70 /| Response by Def. Ankerfarm S.p. A.
6/26/70 Motion of (1) Def. Beecham Group Ltd. to dismiss the complaint as to it on
2 the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction and (2) all defs. to transfer
: this action to the dist. of N.J.
7/7/70 13 Ltr/fr. defendants advising stipulation made today (7/6/70) to Government to
respond to various motion-.
7/22/70 CONSENT of transferee court for assignment of litigation to the Distric C	of Columbia and assignment to Judge John J. Sirica.
7/22/70 OPINION consolidating litigation in the District of Columbia and assigning
actions to Judge Sirica. Actions transferred are - three from
N.D. Ill.; 1 each from E.D. Pa. and New Jersey; and two from
S.D. Florida. Copies of opinion to transferee and transferor
judges & clerks, involved counsel, members of Panel and hearing
clerk.
7/27/70 MARK DRUGS, INC., ET AL. V. BRISTOL- MYERS CO., ET AL., N.D. ILL., No. 70 C 1742
SIO ENTERED TODAY. SENT TO ALL COUNSEL AND INVOLVED JUDGES
8/7/70 MARK DRUGS, INC., ET AL V. BRISTOl~-MYERS CO., ET ak. , N.D. ILL., No. 70 C |
—_— EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK AND INVOLVED JUDGES
9/11/70 THE STATE OF N.Y., V. BRISTOL-MYERS CO., et al, S.D. N.Y., No. 70 C 3849
SUN) ENTERED TODAY SENT TO ALL COUNSEL AND INVOLVED JUDGES
9/29/70 STATE OF N.Y. V. BRISTOL MYERS CO., ET AL., S.D. N.Y., No. 70 C 3849
CTO EFFECTIVE TODAY.
a ————— NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK AND INVOLVED JUDGES.

"9/30/70 MEDILEN DRUG INC., ET AL V. BRISTOL-MYERS CO., ET AL, S.D. N.Y., No. 70
Civ. 4139. Sh mB LER ER ed ODAY SENT TO ALI COUNSEL AND INVOLVED JUDGES
10/7/70 KUTZA BROS. DRUGS, INC., ET AL. V. BRISTOL MYERS CO., ET AL., N.D. Ill.
No. 70C 2247. CTO ENTERED TODAY. SENT TO ALL COUNSEL & VINVOLED JUDGES.
- j EE ————
10/16/70 MEDILEN DRUG INC., ET AL V. BRISTOL-MYERS CO., ET AL, S.D. N.Y., No. 5
70 Civ. 4139. CTO EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK AND C	INVOLVED JUDGES
10/23/70 KUTZA BROS. DRUGS. INC., et al v. Bristol-Myers Co., et al, N.D. Ill.,
No. 70C 2247 - GLO EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK AND
I INVOLVED JUDGES
11/6/70 SOL S. TURNOFF DRUG DISTRIBUTORS, INC., etc. v. Bristol-Myers Co.,
. et al, E.D. Penn., No. 70-2702. Qiu,	ODAY MAILED TO ALL COUNSEL
INVOLVED IN LITIGATION AND TO INVOLVED JUDGES
11/10/70 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO V. BRISTOL-MYERS CO., et al, N.D. Calif.,
No. 70-2339 WIS. CZQ.ENTERED TODAY. SENT TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD,
AND TO INVOLVED JUDGES.
11/24/70 SOL S. TURNOFF DRUG DISTRIBUTORS, INC. V. BRISTOL MYERS CO., ET AL. E.D. Pa.,
No. 70-2702. fala NN IU HOU ERD TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK AND JUDGE
ol AND TRANSFEROR CLERK AND JUDGE.
11/27/70 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO V. BRISTOL-MYERS CO., et al, N.D. Calif.,
No. 70-2339-WTS. QIQuEFEECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK AND
: INVOLVED JUDGES
12/8/70 SOL S. TURNOFF DRUG DISTRIBUTORS, INC., etc. v. Beecham Group Ltd., N.J.
No. 1537-70. GIQuENLERER TODAY. SENT TO ALL COUNSEL ( counsel of record),
AND INVOLVED JUDGES
12/24/70 SOL S. TURNOFF DRUG DISTRIBUTORS, INC., etc. v. Beecham Group Ltd., N.J.
No. 1537-70-. mae: TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK AND INVOLVED
JUDGES.
7/12/71 THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO V. BRISTOL-MYERS, D. PUERTO RICO, CA 208-71
fo aI) ht SS today. Notified counsel and involved judges.
7/28/71 THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO V. BRISTON - MYERS, D. PUERTO RICO, CA 208-71
Sune] final today. Notified transferge clerk, transferor clerk andinvolved judges.
2/12/73 STATE OF MICHIGAN, ETC. V,. BRISTOL-MYERS CO., ET. AL., E.D.MICH. 39225
NOuNe) ghtered today. Notified counsel, involved judges.
2/23/73 STATE OF MICHIGAN, ETC. V. BRISTOL-MYERS CO., ET AL., E.D. Mich., 39225
oo NOTICE OF OPPOSITION received fr. def. Brsitol-Myers & Beecham
/ ORDER entered staying execution of 2/12/73 CTO. Notified counsel & judges.
75 REQUEST OF opponentx for ext. of time to file motion to & incl. 3/28/73
| ORDER granting opponents ext. of time to file motion to & incl. 3/23/73 only
os g gE . F et - 3 Pd ah ps
pea 9 pr ed “2 _ oo P pa
J > SS SN, Sr NT SGT
\ = ht CC” ~ 24 h. “a Pa - ES

HJ M . .
Ze
co
3
Eo
O b-
R33 . . .
Date Q
3/26/73 } /5 | STATE OF MICHIGAN V. BRISTOL MYERS CO., E.D. MICHIGAN, 39225 |
] Withdrawal of notice Of opposition from REERNANXRKRNRXKXAXXARG
lL] REERHANKXXREXXARA BRISTOL MYERS with concurrence indicated Irom
| Beecham 1td., and Beecham, Inc.
he ORDER - lifting stay of 2/12/73 CTO
nn onditional Transfer Order final today. Notified ransieree cler
CC] involved judges and counsel.
2 JZ| BEECHAM GROUP LIMITED AND BEECHAM INC withdrawal of opposition to
| 1 x cto
’ || ORDER == reassigning litigation to JUDGE CHAR RT RICHEY TOT
[ coordinated or consolidated pretrial Proceedings pursua0 28 U.S. Co §a07—D DUtIo © TO Ivea Judes
[1 Counsel, cler
1
1
hn
1
.
LC]
|
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
|
[|
I
]
]
]
]
I
|] :
|]
]
yf
[
]
{|
| |
| ]
|
—] |

, ry i . 2 A, ES i ov 2 |
- /{ /: 15 F. A 3/7 Caded /5/63	Iv & 4a 70 é DOCKET NO. 50
DOCKET -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATIO J
@® Description of Litigation -
DOCKET NO. 50 - AMRICILLIN, ANTITRUST LITJIGAT oy Z po Hox CX ei eeEA ps TA . a — fe
pcstaals (), QO harlea K, Pioleg ; 7 YZ JX. eo [53/05	SS 00 ty SR SSRIS Sy # ~SARA”	Sia SA. ~i ERT S SA PR O
GTR GISTRICT &\] ‘RANSFER[
NO. A CAPTION D.C. NUMBER} JUDGE DATE MISC.
A-1 The State of Indiana, etc. v. Bristol- ‘N.D. Ill. JLynch Beeston JEPMyers Co., et al. RYE pO 70 C 896 | —y Ly AT ’~ 1 / gE Ey
~8 |The State of Connecticut v. Bristol- (CH nap]. 2S AS SE FES
@o Myers Co., et al. 27 2% 70 C 931 ] ~\ 7 / _ 4 , i. So
A-3 "|The State of New Mexico v. Bristol: A DP. . "5 l ‘7 AMyers Co., et al. EVEN re 0 0 [ay aw
A-4 United States of America v. Bristol- -~D. D.C. fo r $4] . J ERR oDMyers Co., et al. 822-70 TT TX
A-5 |Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. v. Bristol- D. D.C. " vl A, |=
re i. i Ve Fo oy
A-6 The State of Louisiana v. Bristol- D. D.C. "og am SAT fa Le
Myers Co., et al. 1106-70 g Ar	J A)
A-7 Richard Estey d/b/a Rex Pharmacy v. D. D.C. " Co ofs0/75Bristol-Myers Co., et al. 1159-70 ;
A-8 City of New York v. Bristol-Myers Co., D. D.C. - £m
et al. | 1412-70 a
15 yo )ofs 1D	A-9 The State of Vermont v. Bristol-Myers Co.} D. D.C HFet al. 1514-70 " :
@- Sur skate of Georgia . Bristol=Myers DC.. 'Siricaj eSIA/od	Cooly et al 3154-70 T {
So ATE "
‘B-1 City of Philadelphia v. Bristqol-Myersg . NBE.D. Penn. los Chl 2S) To
Co. et al. Al dpBles LET Ya 150-824 “Tp ve Ve I -
J I SPY	= Jit 0B-2 The State of Florida v. Bristol-Myers D.C. Siricd PEC
1536-70 CAT
Co. et al 4 Fv 7

DOCKET No. °0
| DD
DOCKET -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION J T=
® Description of Litigation _AMPICILLIN ANTITRUST LITIGATION
DISTRICT & TRANSFER
NO. CAPTION D.C. NUMBER} JUDGE DATE MISC.
B-3 B&echam Group Limited yv,. Zepith,, Labora-ling. lwhgeld 1/25 gDtories, Inc. 2Ys T/C ©526-69 4 B Yo
B-4 Lee's Prescription Shops, Inc. Vv. . Fla., S. = fPulton plugs
o Bristol-Myers Co., et al. 2005 nn AO 70-748-Civ-qF RY5 3-72 =
B-5 Hospital Development & Service Corp., Fla., S. Cabot wb 3 shotet al. v. Beecham, Inc. SAS TD 70-749-civ-1Cc LYS P- © 4 <0 .
Co 1 3 AeA
B-6 State of Illinois v. Bristol-Myers Co., D. C. « sirical NTA Nofe 511)et al. ] | 2018-70 5 Ho =
pete —a ling Emad Rt SY b/sEa Mark Drug¥, Iac., al v. Brigtol Myers N.D. Iil 3 | Lynch| ¢ Ge a SWCo., et al = REYY 90 70C 1742 "= 197 AL
: Gyorgy sl
C-2 The State of New York, y. Bristol-Myers S5.D. N.Y. 2 2): fs 3
Co., et al a/iij70 290820 70 C 3849 - orf} 37° 2/5 10dN i Vi }
c-3 Medilen Drug Ing Voy] rietol) ers] S.D. —_— EE i VY /	thera ; TT erate 776-7
Co., et al 7/5 iA 24 70 Civ 4139 7
Cc-4 Kutza Bros. Drugs, Inc., et os Vv. BEE FAN.D. I11l.> lIDecke 4/3z PIS soko	Bristol-Myers Co., et al. /¢& 7]70 70C 224 an
C-5 Sol S. Turnoff Drug Distributors, Inc, E.D. Penn. - Y	etd. v. Bristol-Myers Co., et al 3877 70-2702 %» bias ” DUS #0 28
2 Zit Wo Wo fe 7-27
SRG ER hain Bz ler SUZ S Sua got i, 5 3 or ¥ Le )” Sa Ei hats
c-7 Sol Ss. Turnoff Drug Distributors, Inc., mar De 0/20 b 4	etc. v. Beecham Group Ltd. /Q [vs Jed dilinnlg .
(8/2 — | 2m
| “V>re/>/i0l)
C-8 The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Bristolh D. Puerto /z fr dMyers Co., et al. 73/7 /377-77 | Rico “or, 7/2 §/ / 1/577- 7/	ES	BRR m0 a Tm ir A co cn Stesont tg nse thst ph Sos ers a WARE iTR i a ;
@.- State of 55s Vv. Bristol-Myers Co., [E.D. Mich. {Freema: LICE 7:ct al. a) 23 jA3srE POR TR § Els
) if Td ae yt 4 Jr J ¢id § :

DOCKET NO. 50
ya7ADOCKET -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION i —
Description of Litigation
AMPICILLIN ANTITRUST LITIGATION
NO. CAPTION D.C. NUMBER] JUDGE DATE MISC.
XYZ-} Texas. . v. Bristol-Myers, et al. D. C. 7	2476-701" eet £5 / O [3 5/ D
. my . ~~ ™,
XYZ-2 | Massachusetts v. Bristol-Myers, et al. 2174-70 mmf rmmmremememmnrsciniomos	mn w/e [sD
@:-: Pennsylvania v. Bristol-Myers, et al. 237	1= 7 Odin A— 2/2 [511)	Dd
XYZ-4 | Kansas v. Bristol-Myers, et al. 2504-70 S— NE 10/3) 10>
XYZ-5 | Arizona v. Bristol-Myers, et al. 2683-70 | om ~ y0)2/5 D= j - o d A —- oD en : —_ a
XYzZ-6 | Albert H. Kaynesy . Bristol Myers met 4#504 70.7 Et ) y 5XYZ-7 | Minnesota v. Bristol-Myers, et al. 3077-70 ree —43 1202 fF
XYZ-8 | State of Iowa v. Bristol-Myers, et al. 3221-70 mmf a sof fo 1D
teviont v. Bristormers. BI = VASXYz-9 | State of Mississippi v. Bristol-Myers, eg 3588-701" a 7 1 2/5 hd
XyzZ-10 Alabama v. Bristol-Myers, et al. 3589-70 UR “k pefifs 7S
XYZ-1] Holy Redeemer Hospi . Bristol-Myers, Ze ; A.
reality LES 338=7" NC
XYZ-134 Ohio v. Bristol-Myers, et al. 634-7)1— — ESN | A i
Xyz-13] Nevada v. Bristol-Myers, et al. 1322-71 =efon mmf /e 2/5 HD
Z-14] City & Cty.=of San Francisco v. Birstol- i . fo foi	Myers, et al. 1366-71 — ET EE.§ BC REY A
XYZ-15| Maciropa Cty. (Ariz.) v. B-My, et al. 1367-71 a— oh [51/1
XYZ- Virginia v. Birstol-Myers, et al. 1874-71 Py ,
F227 3~ — 2/2 /s rrXYZ-17]State of Hawaii v. Bristol oo ’ +, 3
po sneer |
| Medelen prog foc. st al, v. Bri “ob /5 za —Rar Ay ard RII
| Myers Co. = AAA eA
/ of
SERA . .

~ 9 2) | TR a 1495 29 qc a a9 99a aATT5, |»
ol Gm J hy " o ~ Pa ~ a NL my I
x 2 ~~ X ~~ NN AN aN \§ AN XN NNNd o& oY	= . ~ ~N ~ ~ I >o	4 Dy SN Co Po,
X A AE & IN Ng go 2 NER RIND x~ Ds NEE RO[/9N RR
CEE TEAM Nm rh pee Re Nr	OU {loH a : ; : ’ [SNE TE RE A ts ? : Bi< ||P EX : : : * 1 ; i 3 : 1)	Ay gn : : : ‘ : = { H : : i ; :
"a3 SE TEs. IE EE SR SS PO Cl
SN ; ERA CE EE
Sol | HE	a = AS Se SRN RK bi FN : § i H | A : .
0 = | Vo EA AN N |	HP ! : ] § H EN $ JPR Sa q i \ f { : P\ BENS :
cE Co \ CRT	| ; i | : EN SEE
28 : ! | ; ; IN : 3—— i | i | LU Ne > J
5 | ! p ; | : TRVER CAN :
nH : ; : : y i i ; NEN :
co : : } V i i : : ! IN O NEN YT	i "AQ i ; ; f | i : : i i “5G
~ | & ! : ; | i | ! PRY bE Lo	a Bo ] ! ; 1 y | i COANY Cy J AS
[5] - | ; i : i : . t i ) : i : A :
=) : : ; * : : a - ——
| : i | | ! ; - :
g 5 ol { | i | . SS I S$	~~ [4 ; : i i ! ey ;
Z| | oa } | | : A ! ; ; 3
BIER Lo \ [NN ES ET I A BE	.r | i AY Wy ;
~ og Zz 1 . 3 : : ! { cd ;
i | : } by : } i |
) ; 3 | | )
of 11D — — — WN A k TTT :	Ld I 0) ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ Ad ~N moO I hh HA edn“go 1 | 1. { [ SOY NG ~ r~ ~ I~ VW ON WwW mo
«ll a ~ on — (oe) Ne ~ I- } | i ~ © © WW oo WV
oO mos ow ~ © o ~ [ © tn NN © I “A ~~ 4 Oo oZz lA Mm coc © — — ™ ! ~ ~ 3 in oo | | i I ]
lo) NN ~N ~N ~N >No < AN nN ~V~ St Tel Te}
Eo Ho ve) — ~ ~~ mM ~ ~~ ~~
my ~ ! [0] y Ee J 4	WP
Iv i 1 H 0 — Sy SH
3) Po 0) 0] 0 = 0) 0]Qo 0 > Nai + I q >
a D s ~ Pi 0) 1 ~~ 0 =
0} . 1 Ho. ow -r — 1 oO > wn ] 0
| > — 00 a4 ¥ 0 — p= 5 —~ oq
PN o} 0 SNC Mm + 0 0) [ 0 oO wo
| Mm Q +H > al 0 + ol ~~ > 0 + >	Q n « Hom Uo = . al 10] H 0 n = 4 n =
! . ne A HY 0 > Fo -— m P 4 [ O -r 1
> n © Ny [i no HA Mm H 0 Oo > 0 Y —
Q Mm . Hy 0 © Mm «+ A D> 0 =H 4 9m Q0 oP > 0 = © HP ol . oS 4 = DP 1 I) OD
o + co . 0] > Nn a > . m I 0) — Sy . 0
ol 0 [0] > 0] -— Q -d -r > o ~ oo = > A
il M BH o~ 4 ~ £0 NH o = 0 + 0 4 BP ] H	+ © + A a» DP Tm Hoe oH oye + > Yd Mm no 0} m
af AA ~0 HN 40 0 ~ HH w- MH on 0 - 0 4
3] © nO 3 [oN ©) QO -H © > © a © [ON 1s] a £3 -r . ~ + 0} .0 5 A 0 4 SH a > 0 a) ~ wn YH > Mm (0) 0 pd	+ Ln n -— 0 + Mm Q +P OU By PP co m ol o
“0 4 on -Y Toe noe wy go nw Id . 4 ©
O £0 a BR ag U U4 Q ri Q la. Q ] 0 . + > m [0 jo
Zz ~ 2 2 = pu oO 2 o> = T Es Es Mo = o > 9 0 = nHO 1 Ww Ho 0 oP HO WHO WHO H OO 0 © © > a wu
00 tH [OE oO HY TO ov (ON & 00 (o] T [a] n [i] H
0 0 0] [0] O03 Q 3 [0] [)] o 0
Ow + Qo + £2 0H Oo ~ Ow [ONE] QO ®m Q 4 « Q le) -— 10}
Poy Nun Hos Pn ”nnod HQ ss PHO PH PY +H > 0 bP te o> 4
i | oS 0 Dem © © -r gw SO ag QO cg gq QO © 4) i 3 a [o)] Q sz
Il PN HY Po PY HAP ©8880 HD E> 8B 4 «+A O 0 0 HN 5 S	ws Um nO wuAd OSU Sno ws ns us mn UU UO Ww BH O 2
1 oy eer emt meme en ELL ei sro emAr
© 3 [J] [eo] [03] Cc — oN on < un O r~ [00] aN Oo ~~ oN on <
| — ~ oN N AN ~N N AN AN NN NM Mm Mm Mmm
Huy ¢ 1 1 I 1 i fl 1 il 1 I ! I 1 | | i |
562 5 5% 0m 0» om > SEE STE 508 5 oS NN SS	tO ! >
a bad i es wi i > bal i > 154 a SS BS SS > 154 9)

| ~ F o o,
a. 0 0 g Hh 5 o
OH EEE
© L BhRal &
= Nn H O 1 ]
oe XO } or
. § gE > 8: NY ON : =
NAN ~ i : a a o
Wh a 3~T : ot )
AY ~ : 0 hs!
wo PS a N 5
hd J “D 0 ON FE w Hy
»N | pA NE Sipe A HS	. . : AN pon Nye d H- 0 = =
ANE g a NO	A £ ASN ~, Lo 8 & =
{ : b 8 \ ToL FE Ce H-\ SO ~ i lo} he |
| < i SAN we EP 2 |	~ R L NN N 2 ;
~ ON AS N NA Ho 8
; H Po Oo H =
i {od ~ Ny ™ Nod BH H-
Ny 3 ! or | NE NO Ho 2	a j 2 or ~~ o iA 12 wo
MEER CN ES 38
NN vo Poe IS g
Q 3 x 1 op En I 3 Bell PP	~~ i Q f Lo RL 4 :
N | <x ) | — x EA > _ 2 a 2: i Sa Er TY NLD I) Pe iE
A oY NJ AN i AS = \ 5 O Io) a
N\ PEN ® i =(> Nf 220) |S
Ce 9 FT Yea | BE\ (0) i V8 £0. TN . .	( Y i ~ TRAN © O +
AN X N EN ad BRNN EA |
~~. - : | H
RN ~ lus- NL mB	0 | FI F<
i i w/
ON | Ba
So 3 Ces	A) i ,
N\ I	\ : i «oo
~ R i h
o A SPF E
= > Nl £8| x DN vn ONo ~ [5 or
: [\, Wl >, [oT os !	oP
o = !4 - Va P-
Sram? [0)} fr
0

COUNSEL OF RECORD DOCKET NO. 5Q )
ATTORNEY LIST -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
——————
® ~~ DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATION =AMPICILLIN ANTITRUST LITIGATION
EL
No. | . Plaintiff : . Defendant
Lee A, Freeman, Jr., Esq. } } oe
A-1 Freeman, Freeman & Salzman BRESTOL-MYERS COMPANY
Suite 3200 ~Z/ Isham, Lincoln & Beale
C One IBM PLAZA, Chicago, Ill. 60611 eC 1 First National Plaza	} _ - = EE Chicago, Illinois 60670
A-2 Robert K. Killian, Attorney General-~ So . In
bi # State of Connecticut Ce
State Office Building BEECHAM GROUP LIMITED: -
Hartford, Connecticut BEECHAM, -ENC&
Te =z Mayer, Brown & Platt
So Kleinman, O'Neill, Steinberg & 231 South LaSalle Street
Lapuk @c Chicago, Illinois 60604	99 Pratt Street. oe
Hartford, Connecticut 06103 :
Granvil I. Specks, Esquire
Perry Goldberg, Esquire | Ca :
Friedman, Koven, Shapiro, Salzman,
~~ Koenigsberg, Specks & Homer
208 South La Salle Street
Chicago, Illinois 60604 - oo
A-3 Same As A-2 (Granville I. Specks) SE . :
William C. Marchiondo, Esquire
ks McAtee, Marchiondo & Michael
315 Fifth Street, N.W.
® Albuquerque, New Mexico| James A. Maloney, Esquire
| Attorney General State of New Mexico
| P. O. Box 2246
| Santa Fe, New Mexico
A-4 Richard H. Stern, Esquire BRISTOL-MYERS COMPANY
Department of Justice Joseph A. Fanelli, Esquire
' Antitrust Division - Corcoran, Foley, Youngman & Rowe
Washington, D. C. ® 1511 K. Street, N.W.	Washington, D. C. 20005
-5 David I. Shapiro, Esquire
) A-¢ Thomas W. Mack, Esquire BEECHAM GROUP LIMITEDFederal Bar Building, West BEECHAM, . INC. i
Washington, D. C. 20006 Steptoe & Johnson
a - 1250 Conn. Aven, N.W.
¢ Washington, D. C. 20036
ford wal fF thet sp 0

No. Plaintiff : Defendant
- Stanl M. ] ; - oo )
a-7 | Pomeraktz, £Lo5STAR 1 BRR ig eo ck . _ }
295 Madison Ave.
New York, New York 10017 ) ®
A-8 Same as A-5, A-6 (David I. Shapiro)
A-9
B-1 0 ERE EER RE ER i. Richard G. Schneider, Esquire
N David Berger, Esq. — Dechert, Price & Rhoads
ES 1622 Locust Street 1600 Three Penn Center
SC Philadelphia, Penna. 19103 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102
For: BEECHAM GROUP LTD. &
BEEMHAM, INC.
B-2 Earl Faircloth, Esq. | ®Attorney General of Florida
Capitol Bldg.
Tallahasee, Florida
John R. Barrett, Esquire
Barrett, Diliberto & Holober .
Suite 200, Greater Miami Federal Bldg
200 Southeast First Street
Miami, Florida“ 33131
Also same as (A-5) Shapiro & Mack
B- 3 | Bitmeys Hardin & Kipp ADDITIONAL	COUNSEL FOR BRISTOL
526 Broad Street MYERS
Newark, New Jersey 07102 ~7Z Jerome C. Shapiro, Esq.Hughes, Bubbard & Reed
C 1 wall Street	New York, New York 10005
B-4 Sager & Burns
B-5 1406 Biscayne Building B-3 ZENITH LABORATORIES
19 West Flagler Street ~~ Simon & Allen } CMiami, Florida 33130 744 Broad Street
Newark, New Jersey 07102
B-6 John P. Meyer, Esquire
500 Bresee Tower
Danville, Illinois ADDITIONAL COUNSEL FOR BEECHAM
= GROUP LIMITED AND BEECHAM, INC.
c-1 Lawrence Walner sobert F. bobbin, Esquire
53 W. Jackson St. C yon ingChicago, Ill. 60602 New York, New York 10005
Schlifkin & Berman Cte, (arr. SFE
. 134 N. LaSalle St. : SECS ES : iil
Chicago, Illinois 60601 Donald Horowitz, Esq.Cummins, Cummins, Dunn, Horowita,
Rosner & Pashman
Court House Towersy 39 Hudson St.
Hackensack, N.J. 07601

DOCKET NO. 50
ATTORNEY LIST -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
eee ee I
DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATION
UU
No. Plaintiff Defendant
ADDITIONAL COUNSEL FOR AMERICAN
C C-2} Louis J. Lefkowitz HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATIONAttorney General Mark F. Hughes, Esq.
80 Centre St. Willkie, Farr & Gallagher
New York 13,:N.Y. 1 Chase Manhattan Plaza
Attn: Samuel A. Hirschowitz New York, New York 10005
Asst. Atty. Gen.
__C-3 Emil Greenberg
Sal 50 Court St.
~_ Brooklyn, New York 11201
Cc-4 Harry Rebenstein, Esquire
11 South LaSalle
Chicago, Illinois 60603 |
C-5 Seymour Kurland, Esq.
Judah I. Labovitz, Esq.
: Wolk, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen
12th Floor Packard Blgd.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102
2-6 Thomas M. O'Connor, Esq.Milton H. Mares
. Patrick R. Kelly
a X
T 206 City Hall	i San Francisco, Calif. 94102
XXX Timothy J. Sweeney
132 State Judicial Bldg.
40 Capitol Square
Atlanta, Ga. 30334
c-7 Leonard J. Felzenberg, Esd.
Roskein, Kronisch & Felzenberg
| 17 Academy St.
| C Newark, New Jersey 07102	(Also Same as C-5, Kurland, Esq.)

No. } Plaintiff : Defendant
Cc-8 ff Blas C. Herrero, Esq. : LT :
Attorney General To
Deptatment of Justice : oo
San Juan, Puerto Rico
D-1 1 Harold E. Kohn, Esq.
1700 Market St.
Philadelphia, Penna.
| Jerry S. Cohen
1776 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20006