5:25-cv-00272•DINKINS v. PINERO
Texto completo
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION TREY LORENZ DINKINS, Petitioner, v. AARON PINEIRO, Warden, Respondent. Case No. 5:25-cv-272-TES-CHW Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Before the U.S. Magistrate Judge ORDER ADOPTING THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) [Doc. 19] to dismiss as untimely Petitioner Trey Lorenz Dinkins’s Section 2254 federal habeas action [Doc. 1] and to deny Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. 7] as moot. [Doc. 19]. Petitioner has not filed a timely objection or sought an extension of time to file an objection within the 14-day period outlined in the magistrate judge’s R&R. [Doc. 19, p. 6]. Thus, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), in connection with Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1) & (d). Having considered the R&R, the Court finds no clear enumeration of error and agrees with the findings and conclusions of the United States Magistrate Judge. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the United States Magistrate Judge’s R&R [Doc. 19] and MAKES IT THE ORDER OF THE COURT. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Case 5:25-cv-00272-TES-CHW Document 20 Filed 12/29/25 Page 1 of 2
2 Respondent Warden Aaron Pineiro’s motion to dismiss as untimely [Doc. 13] and DISMISSES Petitioner’s Petition [Doc. 1] without prejudice. Additionally, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. 7] as moot. The Court further DENIES a certificate of appealability. SO ORDERED, this 29th day of December, 2025. S/ Tilman E. Self, III TILMAN E. SELF, III, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Case 5:25-cv-00272-TES-CHW Document 20 Filed 12/29/25 Page 2 of 2
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.