BRADLEY v. CAMACHO et al

3:25-cv-01573Flnd14 de nov. de 2025

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
RUSSELL BRADLEY,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 3:25-cv-1573-TKW-ZCB
BRUCE CAMACHO,
Defendant.
/
ORDER
This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 8). No objections were filed.
Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the entire
case file, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that this case
should be dismissed because the amended complaint is an impermissible shotgun
pleading. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that:
1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice because the amended
complaint is an impermissible shotgun pleading that does not comply with the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Case 3:25-cv-01573-TKW-ZCB Document 9 Filed 11/14/25 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2
3. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close
the case file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of November, 2025.
__________________________________
T. KENT WETHERELL, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:25-cv-01573-TKW-ZCB Document 9 Filed 11/14/25 Page 2 of 2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.