1:24-vv-01698•LONCARICH-BOECKMAN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
LONCARICH-BOECKMAN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
1:24-vv-01698Uscfc20 de jan. de 2026
Texto completo
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 24-1698V ASHLEY LONCARICH-BOECKMAN, Petitioner, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran Filed: December 16, 2025 Timothy Patrick Clancy, Clancy & Thompson, PLLC, Tulsa, OK, for Petitioner. Rachelle Bishop, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On October 18, 2024, Ashley Loncarich-Boeckman filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that the misadministration of an October 19, 2022 influenza vaccine caused her to suffer adverse effects that entitle her to compensation under the Act. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On December 15, 2025, Respondent filed a combined Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer, in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer at 1. Specifically, Respondent agrees that Petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table. Id. at 4-5 (citing 42 1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Case 1:24-vv-01698-UNJ Document 26 Filed 01/20/26 Page 1 of 2
2 C.F.R. §§ 100.3(a), (c)(10)). Respondent further agrees that Petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act. Id. at 6 (citing Section 13(a)(1)(B) and Section 11(c)(1)(D)(i)). In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master Case 1:24-vv-01698-UNJ Document 26 Filed 01/20/26 Page 2 of 2
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.