Qazi v. USA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer
Civil Action No. 24-cv-00552-PAB-CYC
SHEHERYAR ALAM QAZI,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RECOMMENDATION
This matter is before the Court on the Order and Recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge [Docket No. 63]. The Recommendation states that objections
to the Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after its service on the
parties. Docket No. 63 at 7 n.2; see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The
Recommendation was served on December 17, 2025. No party has objected to the
Recommendation.
In the absence of an objection, the district court may review a magistrate judge’s
recommendation under any standard it deems appropriate. See Summers v. Utah, 927
F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (“It
does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate’s
factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party
objects to those findings.”). In this matter, the Court has reviewed the Recommendation
Case No. 1:24-cv-00552-PAB-CYC Document 65 filed 01/06/26 USDC Colorado
pg 1 of 2

2
to satisfy itself that there is “no clear error on the face of the record.” 1 Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b), Advisory Committee Notes. Based on this review, the Court has concluded that
the Recommendation is a correct application of the facts and the law. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the Order and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge [Docket No. 63] is ACCEPTED. It is further
ORDERED that defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint [Docket No. 47] is
GRANTED. It is further
ORDERED that plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. It is
further
ORDERED that this case is closed.
DATED January 6, 2026.
BY THE COURT:
PHILIP A. BRIMMER
Chief United States District Judge
1 This standard of review is something less than a “clearly erroneous” or “contrary
to law” standard of review, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), which in turn is less than a de novo
review. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
Case No. 1:24-cv-00552-PAB-CYC Document 65 filed 01/06/26 USDC Colorado
pg 2 of 2