USA v. Campos-Rutiaga et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case No. 18-CR-00192-RM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
JUAN ALEJANDRO MARRUFO-SIERRA,
Defendant.
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW and REASONS
FOR ORDER OF DETENTION
This matter is before the court for detention hearing on May 21, 2018. The court
has taken judicial notice of the court’s file and the pretrial services report. Moreover, the
court has considered the proffers by the defendant and the government.
In order to sustain a motion for detention, the government must establish that (a)
there is no condition or combination of conditions which could be imposed in connection
with pretrial release that would reasonably insure the defendant’s presence for court
proceedings; or (b) there is no condition or combination of conditions which could be
imposed in connection with pretrial release that would reasonably insure the safety of
any other person or the community. The former element must be established by a
preponderance of the evidence, while the latter requires proof by clear and convincing
evidence.
If there is probable cause to believe that the Defendant committed an offense
Case No. 1:18-cr-00192-NYW Document 172 filed 05/21/18 USDC Colorado pg 1
of 4

which carries a maximum term of imprisonment of over 10 years and is an offense
prescribed by the Controlled Substances Act, a rebuttable presumption arises that no
condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the
person as required and the safety of the community.
The Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g), directs the court to consider the
following factors in determining whether there are conditions of release that will
reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety of any
other person and the community:
(1) 	[t]he nature and circumstances of the offense charged, including whether
the offense is a crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug;
(2) 	the weight of the evidence against the person;
(3) 	the history and characteristics of the person, including –
(A) 	the person’s character, physical and mental condition, family ties,
employment, financial resources, length of residence in the
community, community ties, past conduct, history relating to drug or
alcohol abuse, criminal history, and record concerning appearance
at court proceedings; and
(B) 	whether at the time of the current offense or arrest, the person was
on probation, on parole, or on other release pending trial,
sentencing, appeal, or completion of sentence for an offense under
Federal, State or local law; and
(4) 	the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the community
that would be posed by the person’s release.
The government is requesting detention in this case. In making my findings of
fact, I have taken judicial notice of the information set forth in the pretrial services report
and the entire court file. Lastly, I have considered the proffers submitted by the
Case No. 1:18-cr-00192-NYW Document 172 filed 05/21/18 USDC Colorado pg 2
of 4

government and defense counsel and the arguments of counsel. Weighing the
statutory factors set forth in the Bail Reform Act, I find the following:
First, the defendant has been charged in the Indictment as follows:
Count 1: 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A)(viii) & 846;
Count 48: 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A)(viii) and 18 U.S.C. § 2; and,
Count 49: 18 U.S.C. § 924(c).
Second, I find that the rebuttable presumption of detention applies in this case
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3) and (f) based upon the charges brought in the
Indictment.
Third, I find that probable cause exists that defendant committed the above
crimes charged in the Indictment.
Fourth, I find that defendant was born in Mexico and is a citizen of Mexico.
Defendant is in the United States illegally. There is a BICE detainer that has been
lodged against the defendant. Defendant does not possess a Colorado Driver’s License.
Defendant has used one alias name in the past. Defendant has suffered one prior
failure to appear which resulted in a warrant being issued and that warrant remains
active. Defendant’s employment status and time in the community are unknown.
Defendant has removed from the United States back to Mexico in the past on an
expedited basis. Defendant has also suffered an adult conviction for Knowingly and
Intentionally Possessing a Quantity of Marijuana (misd). Defendant has an active case
in Arapahoe County Court, Case No. 17-T-5120 wherein he is charged with (1) Driving
Without a Driver’s License; (2) DUI; (3) Alcohol-Open Container - Drink in Vehicle; (4)
Lane Usage Violation; (5) Signaling Violation; and (6) Tail Lamp Violation. There is an
active warrant in this case. Defendant has failed to rebut the rebuttable presumption of
detention. The defendant is not contesting detention.
In light of these facts, I find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant
Case No. 1:18-cr-00192-NYW Document 172 filed 05/21/18 USDC Colorado pg 3
of 4

is a flight risk and that there is no condition or combination of conditions of release that
will reasonably assure his presence in court. Accordingly, I order that the defendant be
detained without bond.
Done this 21th day of May 2018.
BY THE COURT
S/ Michael J. Watanabe
Michael J. Watanabe
U.S. Magistrate Judge
Case No. 1:18-cr-00192-NYW Document 172 filed 05/21/18 USDC Colorado pg 4
of 4