4:25-cv-09155•Abrams v. PG&E Corporation et al
Texto completo
Case No. 25-cv-09155-HSG 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 William B. Abrams end2endconsulting@gmail.com 625 McDonald Ave. Santa Rosa, CA, 95404 Tel: 707 397 5727 Pro Se Fire Victim Claimant and Party to related proceedings before the California Public Utilities Commission UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION WILLIAM B. ABRAMS on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Pro Se Fire Victim Appellant, v. PG&E CORPORATION, PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellees. Case No. 25-cv-09155-HSG Transferred from: BAP No. NC-25-1187 Related to: Bankr. Case No. 19-30088, Adv. Proc. No. 25-03027 (DM) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 7-11 AND BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE 8017(A) FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO APPELLEE’S RESPONSE TO AMICUS BRIEF OF PG&E FIRE VICTIMS XXXXXXXX (as modified) Case 4:25-cv-09155-HSG Document 19 Filed 02/19/26 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 25-cv-09155-HSG 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Upon the motion (the “Administrative Motion”) dated February 16, 2026 filed by William B. Abrams (“Appellant”) pursuant to Rule 7-11 of the Civil Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (the “Local Rules”) and Rule 8017(a) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”) for leave to file his reply to the Appellees’ Response to Amicus Brief [Dkt. 16] (the “Appellees’ Response”) filed concurrently with the Administrative Motion. The Court having determined that the relief requested in the Administrative Motion is in the best interests of PG&E, Appellant, Amici and all parties in interest; and upon all of the proceedings had before this Court and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Administrative Motion is granted as provided herein 2. The Appellant is directed to e-file the Appellant Reply to the Appellees’ Response to Amicus Brief, filed concurrently with the Administrative Motion as Exhibit C on the docket forthwith as a stand-alone document DATED: February ____, 2026 ________________________ The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. United States District Judge 19 Case 4:25-cv-09155-HSG Document 19 Filed 02/19/26 Page 2 of 2
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.