Wright v. Smart ERP Solutions, Inc.

1 25-cv-02588-HSG
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO
FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
37283699.1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Brian A. Paino (SBN 251243)
bpaino@hinshawlaw.com
Helen Mosothoane (SBN 254511)
hmosothoane@hinshawlaw.com
Zeeshan Iqbal (SBN 337990)
ziqbal@hinshawlaw.com
HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP
350 South Grand Ave., Suite 3600
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3476
Telephone: 213-680-2800
Facsimile: 213-614-7399
Attorneys for Defendant
SMART ERP SOLUTIONS, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – OAKLAND DIVISION
RANDALL WRIGHT, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SMART ERP SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Defendant.
Case No.: 4:25-cv-02588-HSG
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLY TO
PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM OF
POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
On August 28, 2025, Plaintiffs Ranfis Espinal Aguilera, Jason Demmie, Alfredo Diaz, Deborah
Finley, Marcus Hines, Stevie Newson, and Randall Wright (together, “Plaintiffs”), individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed their Consolidated Class Action Complaint against
Defendant Smart ERP Solutions, Inc. (“Defendant”). Pursuant to the Order as Modified Granting
Plaintiff’s Motion to Consolidate [ECF 29], this Court set a briefing schedule governing the deadlines
for Defendant to file a pre-answer motion directed to Plaintiffs’ Complaint, and for the parties to
submit their respective briefing thereon. On October 13, 2025, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss
[ECF 65]. On November 26, 2025, Plaintiffs filed their Opposition [ECF 68].
Case 4:25-cv-02588-HSG Document 70 Filed 12/12/25 Page 1 of 2

2 25-cv-02588-HSG
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO
FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
37283699.1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
On December 12, 2025, Defendant filed its Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, through
and including December 31, 2025, to file its Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss. Defendant’s
Motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall file its Reply on or before December 31, 2025.
Dated:
Hon.
12/12/2035
Case 4:25-cv-02588-HSG Document 70 Filed 12/12/25 Page 2 of 2