USA v. Arteaga et al

3:23-cr-00473Cand16 de jan. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
SIERRA PROMISE DUGAN
Sierra Dugan Law
420 3rd Street, Suite 250
Oakland, California 94607
Tel. 510.214.2194
sierra@sierraduganlaw.com
Counsel for Defendant
JOSE MEDINA MURILLO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOSE MEDINA MURILLO,
Defendant.
No. 3:23-CR-00473 CRB
STIPULATION TO EXCLUDE TIME
UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT FROM
JANUARY 6, 2026 THROUGH FEBRUARY
11, 2026; [PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties were scheduled to appear for status on January 6, 2026 that has been continued
to February 11, 2026 at the defense’s request for effective preparation of counsel. The parties
stipulate and respectfully request that the time from January 6, 2026 through February 11, 2026 be
excluded under the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant the continuance would deny counsel the
reasonable time to necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due
diligence.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: January 8, 2026 s/ Sierra Dugan
SIERRA DUGAN
Counsel for Defendant
JOSE MEDINA MURILLO
Dated: January 8, 2026 s/ SD per email authorization
KEVIN YEH
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Case 3:23-cr-00473-CRB Document 93 Filed 01/16/26 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
USA v. Medina Murillo, Stipulation and
[Proposed] Order, Case No. 3:23-cr-00473-CRB
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
For the reasons stated in the parties’ stipulations, the Court finds that the exclusion of time
for effective preparation from January 6, 2026 through February 11, 2026, is warranted and that
the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and defendant
in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). The failure to grant the requested continuance by the
defense would deny the defendant the time necessary for effective preparation of counsel taking
into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date:
HON. CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
January 164, 2026
Case 3:23-cr-00473-CRB Document 93 Filed 01/16/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.