Steve Bell

3:05-bk-34212Canb15 de out. de 2008

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MEMORANDUM DECISION
FOLLOWING REMAND 	-1-
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
In re
STEVE BELL,
Debtor.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 05-34212 SFC
Chapter 13
MEMORANDUM DECISION FOLLOWING REMAND
On September 22, 2008, this court held a hearing regarding
Debtor’s request for attorneys fees incurred in a motion to remedy
a violation of the automatic stay by Clinical Laboratories of
Hawaii, LLP (CLH). 	Cathleen Cooper Moran appeared for Debtor.
Iain A. Macdonald appeared for CLH.
It is undisputed that creditor CLH violated the automatic stay
when its collection agent, NCO, improperly reported amounts Debtor
owed in collection after CLH received notice of Debtor’s
bankruptcy. 	Debtor filed a motion against both CLH and NCO seeking
damages for the stay violation. 	NCO settled with Debtor before
trial.
Following a brief trial, this court ordered CLH to correct the
Signed and Filed: October 15, 2008
________________________________________
THOMAS E. CARLSON
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge
________________________________________
Entered on Docket
October 16, 2008
GLORIA L. FRANKLIN, CLERK
U.S BANKRUPTCY COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case: 05-34212 Doc# 90 Filed: 10/15/08 Entered: 10/16/08 10:42:13 Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MEMORANDUM DECISION
FOLLOWING REMAND 	-2-
credit reports, but found that Debtor had not suffered any other
harm as a result of the stay violation. 	Because Debtor had been
under no exigency and had not sent a letter to CLH before filing
the motion, this court declined to award Debtor fees, citing In re
Risner, 317 B.R. 830, 839-40 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2004).
Debtor appealed this court’s failure to award fees, and the
BAP reversed. 	The BAP noted that CLH had not corrected the credit
report promptly upon the filing of the motion, but only after it
was ordered to do so by the court. 	Risner did not apply, the BAP
reasoned, because CLH’s failure to cure the stay violation promptly
after receiving the motion showed that a formal motion and court
order were necessary. 	The BAP stated “at minimum, debtor is
entitled to his attorney’s fees from the time of the settlement
until the time CLH corrected debtor’s credit reports.”
Upon remand, CLH introduced evidence that NCO had in fact
promptly corrected the credit reports, but had not notified Debtor
of this fact. 	I determine that this undisclosed cure does not
justify a revisiting of the Risner issue. 	Debtor could not be at
ease, and the cure of the stay violation was therefore not
complete, until Debtor received notice that his credit reports had
been corrected. 	That happened only after trial and the issuance of
a court order, as the BAP noted.
Pursuant to the mandate of the BAP, I determine that Debtor is
entitled to recover fees and expenses incurred from the date of the
NCO settlement through the CLH motion to vacate following remand,
including fees and expenses incurred on the appeal. 	The amounts
sought by Debtor’s counsel for this work are reasonable and
necessary. 	Debtor should have been awarded fees at the original
Case: 05-34212 Doc# 90 Filed: 10/15/08 Entered: 10/16/08 10:42:13 Page 2 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MEMORANDUM DECISION
FOLLOWING REMAND 	-3-
trial, and the appeal was necessary to correct this court’s error.
I decline to award fees for work done prior to the NCO settlement,
because much of it was related to damage claims on which Debtor did
not prevail (as were much of the fees incurred from the date of the
NCO settlement through trial). 	After giving full credit to CLH for
the amount NCO paid in settlement (not revealed here because the
settlement was confidential), this court awards Debtor $14,962.00
for fees, and $1,972.10 for expenses.
**END OF MEMORANDUM**
Case: 05-34212 Doc# 90 Filed: 10/15/08 Entered: 10/16/08 10:42:13 Page 3 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COURT SERVICE LIST
Cathleen Cooper Moran, Esq.
Moran Law Group, Inc.
1674 N Shoreline Blvd. #140
Mountain View, CA 94043-1375
Iain A. Macdonald, Esq.
Macdonald & Associates
221 Sansome Street
San Francisco, CA 94104-2323
Case: 05-34212 Doc# 90 Filed: 10/15/08 Entered: 10/16/08 10:42:13 Page 4 of 4

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.