(PS) Mitchell v. U.C. Davis Senior Connections

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PHYLLIS MITCHELL,
Plaintiff,
v.
U.C. DAVIS, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:25-cv-01869-DC-CSK (PS)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(Doc. Nos. 2, 4, 7)
Plaintiff Phyllis Mitchell is proceeding pro se in this civil action. This matter was referred
to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On July 2, 2025, Plaintiff filed a complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
(Doc. Nos. 1, 2.) On September 3, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
herein, which were served on Plaintiff and contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (Doc. No. 4.) Plaintiff
has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations, and the time to do so has passed.
On October 3, 2025, Plaintiff filed a second motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 7.)
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed on September 3, 2025 (Doc. No. 4) are
Case 2:25-cv-01869-DC-CSK Document 12 Filed 01/05/26 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ADOPTED IN FULL;
2. Plaintiff’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. Nos. 2, 7) are DENIED;
3. Plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED without leave to amend; and
4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 3, 2026	___________________________
Dena Coggins
United States District Judge
Case 2:25-cv-01869-DC-CSK Document 12 Filed 01/05/26 Page 2 of 2