(PS)Singh v. Lipworth

2:25-cv-01610Caed17 de fev. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RAJ SINGH,
Plaintiff,
v.
STEPHEN LIPWORTH,
Defendant.
No. 2:25-cv-1610-DJC-SCR
ORDER
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter, which was referred to the Magistrate
Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
On January 5, 2026, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations
herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen
days. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
ECF No. 6.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule
304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully
reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be
supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that:
Case 2:25-cv-01610-DJC-SCR Document 7 Filed 02/17/26 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed January 5, 2026, are adopted in
full;
2. Plaintiff’s FAC is dismissed without further leave to amend; and
3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 13, 2026
Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:25-cv-01610-DJC-SCR Document 7 Filed 02/17/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.