USA v. Humber, et al.

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Co ee YN DBD HO Fe WY! HY

Ny NYO NO NO WHO NO KN NO NO we ome rm rm mm pm pm pm pe
Lo i od ho A <> © >> i ©) i ©) i ~ So. ns \°

AUTHENTICAT
U.S. GOVERNME
INFORMATIO!

G

ERIC GRANT

United States Attorney
ROBERT ABENDROTH
Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney’s Office
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2700
robert.abendroth@usdoj.gov

HARMEET K. DHILLON

Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division
U.S. Department of Justice

CHRISTOPHER J. PERRAS

Special Litigation Counsel

SAMUEL A. KUHN

Trial Attorney

U.S. Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20530
Telephone: (202) 307-6962
christopher. perras@usdoj.gov
samuel.kuhn@usdoj.gov

JOHN A. EISENBERG

Assistant Attorney General, National Security Division
PATRICK CASHMAN

Trial Attorney

U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20530
Telephone: (202) 514-2007

Attorneys for Plaintiff
United States of America

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CASE NO. 2:24-CR-00257-DC
Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING EXHIBITS TO
THE GOVERNMENT’S SENTENCING
v. MEMORANDUM AS SET FORTH IN
GOVERNMENT’S NOTICE

DALLAS ERIN HUMBER,

Defendants.

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS AS SET

RTH IN GOVERNMENT'S NOTICE
oO

10
Ul
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b) and based upon the representation contained in the government’s
Request to Seal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the exhibits to the government’s sentencing
memorandum and government’s Request to Seal shall be SEALED until further order of this Court.

The Court has considered the factors set forth in Oregonian Publishing Co. v. U.S. District Court
for the District of Oregon, 920 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1990). The Court finds that, for the reasons stated in
the government’s request, sealing the government’s document serves a compelling interest. The Court
further finds that, in the absence of closure, the compelling interests identified by the government would
be harmed. In light of the public filing of its request to seal, the Court further finds that there are no
additional alternatives to sealing the government’s motion that would adequately protect the compelling

interests identified by the government.

Dated 2} [es |

{ / The Honorable Dena Coggins
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS AS SET
FORTH IN GOVERNMENT’S NOTICE