USA v. Maxwell

2:24-cr-00140Caed5 de jan. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

1	STIPULATION AND ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
ERIC GRANT
United States Attorney
ROBERT ABENDROTH
HADDY ABOUZEID
Assistant United States Attorneys
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2700
Facsimile: (916) 554-2900
Attorneys for Plaintiff
United States of America
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
NATASHA ELIZABETH POE-CARPENTER,
Defendant.
CASE NO. 2:24-CR-00140 DC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND
EXCLUDE TIME PURSUANT TO THE SPEEDY
TRIAL ACT
STIPULATION
Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and
through defendant’s counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. By previous order, this matter was set for a status conference before the Honorable
Kimberly J. Mueller on January 6, 2026, and the Court excluded time finding that the ends of justice
served by granting the continuance outweighed the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy
trial. ECF Nos. 33 and 39.
2. On December 30, 2025, the Honorable Troy L. Nunley, Chief District Judge, reassigned
this matter to the Honorable Dina M. Coggins, District Judge, for further proceedings. The parties are
requesting to continue the status conference previously set for January 6, 2026 before Judge Mueller to
Judge Coggins’ February 6, 2026, 9:30 a.m. calendar.
3. The parties are still reviewing discovery which includes digital evidence obtained from
cell phones requiring consultation with experts. The parties believe that a continuance of the status
2	STIPULATION AND ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
conference is necessary to allow for reasonable time for effective preparation, taking into account the
exercise of due diligence. The parties therefore request that the Court exclude time pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) (Local Code T4) because the ends of justice served in granting the
requested exclusion outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: January 2, 2026 ERIC GRANT
United States Attorney
/s/ Robert Abendroth
ROBERT ABENDROTH
Assistant United States Attorney
Dated: January 2, 2026 /s/ SHELBY NICOLE ALBERTS
SHELBY NICOLE ALBERTS
Counsel for Defendant
NATASHA ELIZABETH POE-
CARPENTER
3	STIPULATION AND ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the court, having received, read and considered the parties’
stipulation filed on January 2, 2026, and good cause appearing therefrom, APPROVES the parties’
stipulation. Accordingly, the Status Conference scheduled for January 6, 2026, before Senior District
Judge Kimberly J. Mueller is VACATED and RESET for February 6, 2026 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom
10 before the Honorable Dena M. Coggins. The time period between January 6, 2026 and February 6,
2026, inclusive, is excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be
commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), and B(iv) [Local Code
T4], as the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public
and the defendants in a speedy trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 5, 2026	___________________________
Dena Coggins
United States District Judge

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.