Sobirovich v. Unknown Party et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Akramov Bekzodjon Sobirovich,
Petitioner,
v.
Unknown Party, et al.,
Respondents.
No. CV-26-02303-PHX-MTL
ORDER
Before the Court is Petitioner Akramov Bekzodion Sobirovich’s Petition (Doc. 1)
and United States Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf’s Report and Recommendation
(“R&R”) (Doc. 17). The R&R recommends that the Court deny the petition. The
Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the
R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered a waiver of the right to
obtain review of the R&R. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th
Cir. 2003). Neither party filed objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to
review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149
(1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is
not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must
determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly
objected to.”). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well-taken.
The Court will accept the R&R in its entirety. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the
district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
Case 2:26-cv-02303-MTL Document 18 Filed 06/25/26 Page 1 of 2

- 2 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge
may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or
return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.”).
IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 17) is ACCEPTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Petitioner’s petition (Doc. 1) is DENIED and
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment
accordingly and terminate this case.
Dated this 24th day of June, 2026.
Case 2:26-cv-02303-MTL Document 18 Filed 06/25/26 Page 2 of 2