Coronado v. Rokosky et al

2:26-cv-01818Azd20 de jun. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Katia Zegarra Coronado,
Petitioner,
v.
Eric Rokosky, et al.,
Respondents.
No. CV-26-01818-PHX-JCH
ORDER
Before 	the 	Court 	is 	Magistrate 	Judge 	Alison 	S. 	Bachus’s 	Report 	and
Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 32) recommending granting in part and denying in part
the Petition. Neither party objected to the R&R. See generally Docket.
A district court reviews objected-to portions of an R&R de novo. 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Remsing, 874 F.2d 614, 617
(9th Cir. 1989). Failure to timely object may be considered a waiver of a party’s right to de
novo consideration of the issues. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,
1121–22 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). The advisory committee’s notes to Rule 72(b) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure state that, “[w]hen no timely objection is filed, the court
need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept
the recommendation” of a magistrate judge. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s
note to 1983 addition. See also Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir.
1999).
///
Case 2:26-cv-01818-JCH Document 34 Filed 06/20/26 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
After 	independent 	review, 	the 	Court 	is 	satisfied 	that 	Judge 	Bachus’s
recommendation is sound. The Court will adopt the R&R in full.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. 	The R&R (Doc. 32) is adopted in full.
2. 	Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is granted as to her
request for a bond hearing. Respondents must provide Petitioner with a bond
hearing within thirty (30) days, at which hearing the government must bear the
burden of showing that Petitioner should not be released on bond because
Petitioner is a flight risk or a danger to the community. The remainder of the
Petitioner is denied without prejudice.
3. 	Respondents must provide a notice of compliance within 	three days 	of
providing Petitioner a bond hearing.
4. 	Any pending motions are denied as moot and the Clerk of Court shall enter
judgment in Petitioner’s favor and close this case.
Dated this 18th day of June, 2026.
Case 2:26-cv-01818-JCH Document 34 Filed 06/20/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.