Iusipova v. Unknown Party et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Iuliia Iusipova,
Petitioner,
v.
David R Rivas, et al.,
Respondents.
No. CV-26-01129-PHX-AMM
ORDER
On April 8, 2026, Magistrate Judge Alison S. Bachus issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending this Court grant in part and deny in part
Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 13.)
Judge Bachus notified the parties they had fourteen (14) days to file any written
objections to the proposed findings and recommendation. (Id. at 14.) Neither party filed
an objection, and the time to do so has now passed.
A district court is not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is
not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); see also 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (“A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those
portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which
objection is made.”). “[T]he court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on
the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b),
Advisory Committee Notes 1983 Addition. A district judge may “accept, reject, or
modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations” of the magistrate judge. 28
Case 2:26-cv-01129-AMM Document 16 Filed 05/13/26 Page 1 of 2

- 2 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
The Court has reviewed Judge Bachus’s R&R, the parties’ briefs, and the record.
The Court finds no clear error and agrees with the findings and recommendation.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. (Doc.
13.)
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
(Doc. 1.) Petitioner’s request for a bond hearing is GRANTED. Within thirty (30) days
of the date of this Order, Petitioner SHALL be afforded a bond hearing before a neutral
adjudicator at which the government must bear the burden of showing that Petitioner
should not be released on bond because she is a flight risk or a danger to the community.
All other forms of relief in the Petition are DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment
accordingly and close this case.
Dated this 13th day of May, 2026.
Case 2:26-cv-01129-AMM Document 16 Filed 05/13/26 Page 2 of 2